Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.usage.english > #1144925

Re: Double negation

From "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh>
Newsgroups alt.usage.english, sci.lang
Subject Re: Double negation
Date 2026-05-30 19:27 +0000
Organization csiph.com Internet News Service
Message-ID <6a1b3a19.d57bf00d65e9d83a@csiph.com> (permalink)
References <negation-20260530115223@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote:
>   The meaning of "double negation" as in "We don't need no education"
>   often is negation. But recently I read an example where it seems to
>   be actually meant to be double negation in the logical sense:
> 
>   Seemingly from a transcript:
> 
> |. . . The more important thing is what it doesn't say.
> |It doesn't say you're not allowed to automate the kill chain.
> |So you're allowed to do that? You are not not allowed to do that.
> 
>   .
> 


      [not not]  (used that way)  is  not usu. considered...  a
double-negative (iirc)





____________________________________________________________
From	"Peter T. Daniels"  (10 years ago)


A snippet of dialog  from this evening's *Chicago Fire*:

^^^^^^^
Firefighter A: It isn't your job.

Firefighter B [feeling guilty about not telling a woman that he knew 
that her husband had been killed in the tornado]: The hell it isn't.
^^^^^^^

I think "the hell" is more usually used to negate a positive?



------------ B is saying that he should have mentioned it.

Back to alt.usage.english | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Double negation ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-30 10:57 +0000
  Re: Double negation "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> - 2026-05-30 19:27 +0000
    Re: Double negation The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> - 2026-05-30 16:41 -0400
      Re: Double negation Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-05-31 11:49 +1000
        Re: Double negation Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-05-31 05:21 +0200
      Re: Double negation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-31 11:31 +0300
    Re: Double negation  -- (Conrad's  Triple negative) "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> - 2026-05-31 00:13 +0000
  Re: Double negation Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2026-05-31 09:00 +1200

csiph-web