Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usage.english > #1144925
| From | "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.usage.english, sci.lang |
| Subject | Re: Double negation |
| Date | 2026-05-30 19:27 +0000 |
| Organization | csiph.com Internet News Service |
| Message-ID | <6a1b3a19.d57bf00d65e9d83a@csiph.com> (permalink) |
| References | <negation-20260530115223@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote:
> The meaning of "double negation" as in "We don't need no education"
> often is negation. But recently I read an example where it seems to
> be actually meant to be double negation in the logical sense:
>
> Seemingly from a transcript:
>
> |. . . The more important thing is what it doesn't say.
> |It doesn't say you're not allowed to automate the kill chain.
> |So you're allowed to do that? You are not not allowed to do that.
>
> .
>
[not not] (used that way) is not usu. considered... a
double-negative (iirc)
____________________________________________________________
From "Peter T. Daniels" (10 years ago)
A snippet of dialog from this evening's *Chicago Fire*:
^^^^^^^
Firefighter A: It isn't your job.
Firefighter B [feeling guilty about not telling a woman that he knew
that her husband had been killed in the tornado]: The hell it isn't.
^^^^^^^
I think "the hell" is more usually used to negate a positive?
------------ B is saying that he should have mentioned it.
Back to alt.usage.english | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Double negation ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-05-30 10:57 +0000
Re: Double negation "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> - 2026-05-30 19:27 +0000
Re: Double negation The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> - 2026-05-30 16:41 -0400
Re: Double negation Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-05-31 11:49 +1000
Re: Double negation Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-05-31 05:21 +0200
Re: Double negation Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-31 11:31 +0300
Re: Double negation -- (Conrad's Triple negative) "HenHanna" <HenHanna@Posting.from.CsiPh> - 2026-05-31 00:13 +0000
Re: Double negation Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2026-05-31 09:00 +1200
csiph-web