Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #673412

Re: Hachel's blunder

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Richard Hachel wrote:
> >
> > I always said there was something amiss with this business of relativistic
> > integration, where physicists calculate the proper time of an accelerating
> > rocket relative to the Earth's reference frame.
> > It seemed to me that the approximation was correct—that one could indeed
> > set dt = d(tau)/sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} locally.
> > And that the problem lay in the integration itself.
> > But actually, no. It is the equation that is flawed. It is a beautiful
> > equation, certainly. But wrong. Completely wrong.
> > I had started from a personal error—assuming dTo^2 = dTr^2 + d€t^2
> > —but that is incorrect. Just as the Minkowski metric, which leads to
> > dt^2 = d(tau)² + d€² is completely wrong.
> > The advice and research provided by Python—who believed that if there
> > was an error, it couldn't stem from the integration but rather from the
> > formula itself—proved extremely useful.
> > So, we arrive at:
> >
> > <http://nemoweb.net/jntp?vkgxnBVVWIt_RjzJKizuT5Er7GM@jntp/Data.Media:1>
> >
> > ..and not to what physicists say—who make the same blunder I did (in
> > fact, you cannot position yourself at point O and then move to the
> > x-coordinate Tr1 to use an equation that is valid only when starting from
> > O).
> > That was the source of my error, just as the physicists' error stems from
> > their belief in Minkowski geometry—which works only for simple Galilean
> > reference frames where velocity remains trivially constant.
> > It fails to work for rotating or uniformly accelerated reference frames.
> > It is truly alarming to realize that the *entire* doctrine must be
> > scrapped, and everything rebuilt and re-explained from scratch—starting
> > with a clear definition of relativistic simultaneity, a concept physicists
> > mistakenly conflate with chronotropy without understanding the first thing
> > about it.
> >
> > R.H.
> >
> > --
> > Ce message a été posté avec Nemo : <https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=vkgxnBVVWIt_RjzJKizuT5Er7GM@jntp>
> 
> I'll explain since I'm the only genuieses in da room..
> 
> There is a clock..
> it is a giant clock...
> a very big gigantic clock,
> 
> and the time is...
> 
> it's NOW everywhere!!!!
> 
> What time is it now?
> 
> The Time is ... NOW everywhere!!!!
> 
> What time is it now?
> 
> Now?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> it's NOW everywhere!!!!
> 
> it's always now.
> 
> What time is it now?
> 
> didn't you just ask me dat?
> 
> IT'S NOW!!!!
> 
> Well, i beg to differ..not according to Einstein's clock.
> 
> FUCK EINSTEIN'S CLOCK!!!!

In other words, if you want 
"a clear definition of relativistic simultaneity"

it's FUCK EINSTEIN'S CLOCK!

There is only one universal clock, and that clock reads the time is NOW
everywere.














-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hachel's blunder Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2026-09-19 11:44 +0000
  Re: Hachel's blunder Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-09-19 12:01 +0000
    Re: Hachel's blunder Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2026-09-19 12:31 +0000
      Re: Hachel's blunder Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-09-19 12:47 +0000
        Re: Hachel's blunder Daryll Mahurov <ama@dalrolo.ru> - 2026-09-19 16:10 +0000
          Re: Hachel's blunder Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2026-09-19 16:58 +0000
  Re: Hachel's blunder The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-19 12:42 -0700
    Re: Hachel's blunder The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-19 23:44 -0700
      Re: Hachel's blunder The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-20 11:22 -0700
        Re: Hachel's blunder The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 10:43 -0700
          Re: Hachel's blunder The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 14:58 -0700
            Re: Hachel's blunder The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-21 20:59 -0700
              Re: Hachel's blunder The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-22 01:05 -0700

csiph-web