Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275998

Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional 
woman-stalking truck crashing kook), in
<news:bM6dnQLILba4nmrInZ2dnUU7-QednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
> news:mt6ut6$pqr$1@pcls7.std.com...

>> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional 
>> woman-stalking truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>>>> No debris field at PA, because the pilot rammed the plane into the 
>>>> ground. (Normal crashes have the pilot trying to keep the plane
>>>> level, as such, it spreads across a wide area.)

>>> ROTFLMAO because that was one of the other stories that changed once they
>>> realized they were caught in a lie.  And don't worry there are way too 
>>> many lies for the 9/11 hoaxsters like you to deal with all of them.

>> They recovered 95% of the wreckage of Flight 93, k00ktard.  BTW, they
>> recovered 95% of Flight 77 from in and around the Pentagon as well.

> Your complete failure to provide supporting evidence speak volumes.  And I 
> don't call a link from CNN without photos evidence.
> 
> And we know for one thing for damn sure and that is nobody ever tried to 
> rent a hanger and put the airplanes back together like they did with Flight 
> 800.  See:
>  http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/14/us/twa-flight-800-five-things/

That's because they didn't know what caused Flight 800 to crash, and
they needed to find out if it was a problem that could affect other
aircraft. Whereas they knew exactly what caused the 9/11 flights to
crash, and also knew it would be unlikely to affect other aircraft
unless those flights were hijacked. Which is why they added armed air
marshals on each flight, locking cockpit doors, created the TSA, and
allowed pilots to become Federal Flight Deck Officers and thus carry a
loaded gun and act as a federal agent aboard the plane.

You moron. LOL

> =============================
> 
> FYI about the radiation from the nukes that were detonated deep underground.

There was no radiation, and there were no nukes detonated. You're just
a paranoid-delusional schizophrenic kook off his meds, Roger, and thus
far too insane to discern fantasy from reality. Simple, eh?

<snicker>

> So nobody in the area had radiation burns from when those nukes were 
> detonated.  Did you ever stop to think that the people that were in the path 
> of the blast were all vaporized so we have no idea how much radiation they 
> got.  DUH.
> 
> What you really need to do is find out exactly how deep underground nukes 
> work in rock and stop making assumptions about them from nukes in dirt and 
> above ground nukes.  OK?

I know exactly how nukes in rock work, you moron. Rock is
non-conductive, thus it cannot act as a Faraday cage for the EMP. So
the EMP is not attenuated. Had even a small nuke been detonated
anywhere near the WTC towers (given that they sat on bedrock), the EMP
would have blown out electronics for miles around. That didn't happen.

Your other blather about people being "vaporized" by radiation... that
doesn't happen, you moron. Do you know how much radiation it'd take to
vaporize a person? And if there was enough radiation to vaporize a
person, why was no radiation found at the WTC site above background
except for nano-curie tritium-derived amounts of slightly elevated
beta radiation, and ever-so-slightly elevated alpha radiation from a
pharmacologic lab in one of the WTC buildings, despite constant and
on-going radiation monitoring starting from *before* the WTC towers
fell, to *after* the clean-up was done?

If there'd been radiation strong enough to "vaporize" people, it would
have been strong enough to activate pretty much everything in the
area... IOW, it would have been too hot to enter for months if not
years afterward. Way hotter than Fukushima, which was and is very
fucking radioactive. You've been watching too much TV, and your broken
brain can't discern fantasy from reality, Roger. Stop being such a "TV
hugger" (your words) retard, Roger.

Given that the Sedan nuclear explosion of 104 kT caused the
displacement of 11 million tons of soil, and given that the resulting
crater was 330 feet deep and 1280 feet diameter, and given that the
dust cloud from the 104 kT nuclear explosion (smaller than Roger's
k'lamed 150 kT nukes) expanded to a diameter of 5 miles, and given
that the explosion lifted a dome of soil 300 feet above the desert
floor before it vented, and given that the mushroom cloud reached to
12,000 feet, and given that the radiation at the lip of the crater was
500 Rads per hour... why hasn't Rocky explained:

1) why there weren't dozens (since he's k'lamed dozens of nuclear
weapons were detonated at the WTC site) of *larger* (given that his
k'lamed 150 kT nukes were larger than the Sedan shot and he k'lamed
they were buried shallower) gigantic holes that should have been at
least 400 feet deep and 1500 feet in diameter;

2) why there were not dozens of mushroom clouds extending to
approximately 15,000 feet; 

3) why there was no nuclear weapon-related radiation at the WTC site
after his k'lamed dozens of nukes detonated;

4) why, given that even *ONE* such nuclear weapon would have lifted
the WTC's relatively light 1.5 million tons several hundred feet in
the air, didn't the WTC towers rise in height even one inch;

5) and why all of NYC wasn't covered in radioactive dirt from the
estimated 400,000,000 *tons* of soil that would have been displaced
had all his k'lamed nukes been detonated?

And that's not even mentioning that the EMP pulses from your k'lamed
dozens of nuclear detonations would have burned out electronics, so
there wouldn't have been any video of the collapse or immediate
aftermath. Automobiles would have fried their ECUs, helicopters would
have all fallen out of the sky at the same time, all cameras in a
miles-wide radius would have burned out, the electrical grid for most
of that area would have burned out their substations... none of that
happened.

No EMP, no nuclear detonation seismic signature, no radiation burns,
no radiation sickness, no deaths from radiation, no mushroom cloud, no
lifting of the ground in the vicinity of the WTC towers... no nukes.

You moron. LOL

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
  Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
  Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
    Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
      Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
        Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
          Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
          Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
            Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
              Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
      Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
    Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
      Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
      Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
        Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
          Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
            Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
              Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
            Re: Plane truth Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-10 15:26 -0700
  Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
    Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
      Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
        Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
        Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
          Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
            Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
              Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
          Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
            Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
              Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
              Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
                Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
                Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
                Re: Plane truth  (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
                Re: Plane truth  (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
                Re: Plane truth  ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
    Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
      Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
        Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
            Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
              Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
                Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
                Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
                Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
                Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
                Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
                Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
                Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
                Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
                Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
                Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
                Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
                Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
                Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
                Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
                Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
                Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
                Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
                Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
                Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
                Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
        Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
    Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
      Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
        Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
          Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
          Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000

csiph-web