Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #123706

Re: A neat hash table implementation

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 2026-04-10 at 18:50 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 10.04.2026 um 18:16 schrieb wij:
> 
> > I just mention a point: What does it mean "incrementing pointers" in C++ ???
> 
> Going through an unordered_map with iterator is similar to incrementing
> a pointer.
> 
> > It seems you are talking about ideal.
> 
> C++ is closer to that than C.
> 
> > If so simple,easy,powerful, why many programmers (esp. beginners) avoid C++,
>  > ...
> 
> There are a lot of developers with a minimalism mindeset. Being focussed
> on details is an attitude you must have as a developer, but if you're
> only on this level like a lot of passioned C developers, you make a big
> mistake since you don't see the opportunties the abstaction levels above
> in C++ provide.

C++ provides 'illusions' (simple/fast/elegant..), you need to know the low level,
hardware events to harness it, or there are 'surprises'.

All programming have to be converted to machine codes. Human abstraction or 
ideal has no position in CPU's eye (so far, no computing model can surpass
Turing Machine). Some languages can simply its programming model, but not C++.

Doing so (making C++ high level language) might be possible, but not in the
programs you have shown. Your code is immature.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-10 13:13 +0300
  Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 13:07 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 19:50 +0800
      Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 14:34 +0200
        Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 21:11 +0800
          Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 15:19 +0200
            Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 22:35 +0800
              Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 17:07 +0200
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 00:16 +0800
                Re: A neat hash table implementation scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-04-10 16:30 +0000
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 18:50 +0200
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 01:40 +0800
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 08:26 +0200
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 20:09 +0800
                Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 14:29 +0200
              Re: A neat hash table implementation Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-10 18:12 +0300
                Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 00:26 +0800
        Re: A neat hash table implementation 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jmj@energokod.gda.pl> - 2026-04-10 16:38 +0200
          Re: A neat hash table implementation Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 17:08 +0200
    Re: A neat hash table implementation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 19:51 +0800

csiph-web