Groups > comp.security.pgp.discuss > #141

Re: trying to RECOGNIZE REPUNIT FACTORS BY HAND INSPECTION

Subject	Re: trying to RECOGNIZE REPUNIT FACTORS BY HAND INSPECTION
From	barker <name.temporarily.withheld@antispamming.harvard.edu>
References	<jm97ji$ts$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups	alt.politics.org.nsa, sci.math, alt.security.pgp, sci.physics, comp.security.pgp.discuss
Message-ID	<68e501b5fcf97bfe5806b0029f4ff66d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> (permalink)
Date	2012-04-14 10:40 +0200
Organization	mail2news@dizum.com

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> wrote:
> (a) n > m > 0
> (b) n and m are positive integers

Unless you provide an example of a positive integer <= 0, either " > 0"
or "positive" is redundant. Therefore I must apply Rule 1:

Rule 1: Always stop at the first error or anomaly.

Juniors or clerks (eg, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com>) can show
you how to apply the Taylor expansion to solve what I guess this little
problem was meant to be, had it been correctly formulated (more serious
errors in its exposition followed the first one I showed above).

Now, in contrast, here is a real problem, with something valuable to
learn while attempting to solve it.

With everything shown in base-10, consider the two primes:
113136621886721
and
617431748093238554410874808506989442264783116181403206744221352101186333
which when multiplied yield
698541422248819000939556056942681614546383342970851314130956479402221733
63516839384093
What prime, when multiplied by this last number, will yield a repunit?
And how did you find it? No cheating, please.

There is a valuable lesson within the structures of these prime and
nearly-
prime factors.

Notation for non-mathematicians:
A base-10 repunit is (10^n -1)/9 where n is a positive integer. e.g., 111,
1.
A nearly-prime number is a product of two primes. e.g. 111, 4
Warning: 1 is not a prime.

Thank you,

"barker" (associate of the late falsified Dr Pertti Lounesto)

Back to comp.security.pgp.discuss | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: trying to RECOGNIZE REPUNIT FACTORS BY HAND INSPECTION barker <name.temporarily.withheld@antispamming.harvard.edu> - 2012-04-14 10:40 +0200
  Re: trying to RECOGNIZE REPUNIT FACTORS BY HAND INSPECTION quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-14 13:03 -0500
    Re: trying to RECOGNIZE REPUNIT FACTORS BY HAND INSPECTION Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-14 12:34 -0700
      Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS barker <name.temporarily.withheld@antispamming.harvard.edu> - 2012-04-15 06:53 +0200
        Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-15 03:07 -0500
          Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Tonico <Tonicopm@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-15 02:26 -0700
            Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-15 06:18 -0500
          Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-15 06:14 -0500
          Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS barker <name.temporarily.withheld@antispamming.harvard.edu> - 2012-04-16 04:43 +0200
            Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-15 23:43 -0500
              Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-16 05:50 -0700
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-16 05:54 -0700
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-16 12:21 -0500
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-16 09:52 -0700
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-16 14:50 -0500
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-16 12:28 -0700
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-19 04:43 +0200
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS quasi <quasi@null.set> - 2012-04-19 04:08 -0500
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-19 02:47 -0700
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-19 04:22 -0700
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Jan Andres <J@nAndr.es> - 2012-04-19 13:10 +0000
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-19 09:00 -0700
                Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Tonico <Tonicopm@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-19 10:17 -0700
            Re: trying to EXAMINE THE DIGITS OF CERTAIN PRIMES FOR PATTERNS Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@aol.com> - 2012-04-16 06:04 -0700
  Re: trying to RECOGNIZE REPUNIT FACTORS BY HAND INSPECTION Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-14 22:37 +0100

csiph-web