Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: attraction field lattice... |
| Date | 2023-09-03 21:12 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <64F5592B.3AB4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <64F52153.B9B@ix.netcom.com> <ud37r7$14fop$1@dont-email.me> <64F52AFC.23FB@ix.netcom.com> <ud3ag2$14o5v$1@dont-email.me> <ud3jc1$19pes$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 9/3/2023 6:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 9/3/2023 5:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>> > >>> On 9/3/2023 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> In 3d, this field based experimental algorithm of mine is starting to > >>>>> freak me out a bit: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1025546905270974&set=pcb.1025546935270971 > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you get to the link our should I upload it to imgbb? > >>>> > >>>> all is see is a mirror image > >>> > >>> It is not a mirror image. Notice how the field lines don't line up? Btw, > >>> if you use my work, a little credit would be nice. :^) > >>> > >>>> > >>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5I9LamXEAAHSJS?format=jpg&name=large > >>>> > >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1698487309337858172/photo/1 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> Steve Jobs: “Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal†> >> > >> > >> > >> they don't line up because it wasn't programmed to line up. > > My field lines all line up as is. In its original form, not artificially > tweaked with. :^) > > >> > >> > >> do you want me to line it up? i take paypal. > >> > > > > > > LOL!!!! Fair enough. ;^D Touche. Well, I would like a little credit > > since I programmed the god damn thing! :^) What programing did you do???? You just went on open AI Dall-e and prompted: throw some colorful spaghetti on the wall! freak me out a bit dall-e! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 15:23 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:14 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 17:19 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:55 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 18:05 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 20:36 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:12 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:23 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:43 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:33 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 17:21 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:09 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:52 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 17:05 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:59 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 21:55 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-05 12:44 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 18:29 -0500
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 19:29 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-05 21:57 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-08 15:17 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-08 20:23 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 22:30 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 14:12 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Kentarski Freed Chikeng <kentarski.freed.chikeng@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:49 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:52 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 12:59 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 20:09 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 09:01 -0500
Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:37 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:51 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-05 04:18 -0400
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:56 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:33 -0700
Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
csiph-web