Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #616921
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: It only took one glimpse... |
| Date | 2023-08-06 11:39 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <64CFE8E1.3C3B@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <cb30f377-403f-42fb-96c0-93ec158ca3d9n@googlegroups.com> <64CE78F0.9CF@ix.netcom.com> <64CE8403.74BD@ix.netcom.com> <64CEB79F.610E@ix.netcom.com> <64CF0FDC.23FC@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > patdolan wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 9:51:05 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > > On 8/4/2023 9:32 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 9:12:12 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > > >> On 8/4/2023 9:10 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >>> On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 6:39:34 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote:
> > > > > > >>>> ...through a new space telescope to destroy 60 years of Big Bang theory.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> I like an absolute beginning that is of empty dimension.
> > > > > > >> I thought that God was always there. There was no absolute beginning.
> > > > > > >>> Gravity comes later with the beginning of material astronomical forms.
> > > > > > >>> The problem with a singularity is its infinite gravity
> > > > > > >>> is in the way of beginning the universe.
> > > > > > >>> Atoms can split but how can singularities?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For us there was. Only we have an absolute beginning.
> > > > > > > Not Him. He transcends creating.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > So, basically we cannot ask God _when_ we were created because it might
> > > > > > have no sense of time in a sense. Simply due to the fact that it was
> > > > > > always there. No beginning for him.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
> > > > >
> > > > > 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
> > > > >
> > > > > It was pointed out to me that God created light before he created the first light source. There is something for physics to chew on in that historic fact.
> > > >
> > > > Before the big bang...Stars always existed.
> > > >
> > > > You can still see with the naked eye remenants of those stars that
> > > > existed before the big bang. The Big Dipper.
> > >
> > > Now...if you look at the little dipper...it begins to form a pattern.
> >
> > i do have to warn you...don't let the names dippers throw you off, it's
> > not a dipper.
>
> Let me put it in another way...
>
> If you took a peek at what it looks like Before the big bang...
> then you can understand today's arrangement of the stars.
>
> All stars were arranged line the big dipper, but without the handle.
>
> The handle is simply a spread out version of the big dipper without a handle.
>
> All stars before the big bang simply looked like this:
>
> . .
>
> . .
All stars before the big bang were in order...
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
Now, in the explosion they simply spread apart..
. .
. .
.
.
.
The Starmaker
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
It only took one glimpse... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-04 18:39 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 19:44 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 21:10 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 21:12 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 21:32 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 21:42 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 21:51 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-04 22:51 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-05 09:29 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-05 10:16 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-05 13:57 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-05 20:13 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-06 11:39 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-05 23:26 -0400
Re: It only took one glimpse... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 20:30 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:53 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 21:44 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-05 21:50 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 22:02 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 23:23 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 23:47 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 08:12 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-06 14:03 -0400
Re: It only took one glimpse... patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-06 15:31 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-06 11:17 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Virgil Balaev <laii@vblagbig.vv> - 2023-08-06 08:01 +0000
Re: It only took one glimpse... Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:37 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-06 15:00 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-06 16:11 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 16:44 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 22:32 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-07 09:59 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-07 12:19 -0500
Re: It only took one glimpse... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 11:10 +0200
Re: It only took one glimpse... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-07 13:11 +0200
Re: It only took one glimpse... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 12:04 -0400
Re: It only took one glimpse... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-07 12:22 -0500
Re: It only took one glimpse... Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-07 10:01 -0700
Re: It only took one glimpse... whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-07 12:19 -0500
Re: It only took one glimpse... Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 10:46 +0200
Re: It only took one glimpse... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 02:10 -0700
csiph-web