Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #119966

Re: C++ is doomed

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 20:26 +0800, wij wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 12:56 +0300, Paavo Helde wrote:
> > On 30.08.2024 10:24, Mad Hamish wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 18:29:42 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson"
> > > <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 8/28/2024 8:13 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > > > > On 08/28/2024 04:36 AM, David LaRue wrote:
> > > > > > wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> wrote in
> > > > > > news:84a14f68b0a1ebc383cda00624be28f003e7450f.camel@gmail.com:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I just surveyed a local book store for computers: Among the Top100 in 30
> > > > > > > days, the most books is for AI using Python. C++? zero.Â
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Actually, I am not surprised. It seems C++ is the play ground of "C++
> > > > > > > inventor's" ideal, which is proven not very useful (or more problems
> > > > > > > than its benefits, practically).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Almost every job of my career required C++.  AI is not trusted in my
> > > > > > industry.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If you have little use for C++, find something that suits you and your
> > > > > > target
> > > > > > problems.  Recommending others to ignore it is nieve at best.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best of luck to you in your career.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > AI is not necessarily "sell the business to an unknown
> > > > > agent hiding in an arithmetized/algebraized information
> > > > > model guaranteeing neither accuracy nor provenance".
> > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > Oh yeah. Let the AI write code, then you are going to make sure it did
> > > > not make a mistake?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Look, just because lawyers have been dragged over the coals for
> > > tabling motions with non-existant cases referenced by AI is no reason
> > > to suspect that AI code could have any problems
> > 
> > There is also no reason to suspect it would not have any problems.
> > 
> > So far the most adequate description of the state of the current AI is 
> > provided by this infographics: https://xkcd.com/1838/
> > 
> 
> From your reply, I would assume you have no real knowledge of AI.
> Anyone has little knowledge of AI won't expect it can provide exact answer.
> If you understand what O(2^N) mean, there is (pretty much) no exact answer
> (algorithm, precisely) for such problems.
> 

I mean practical algorithm for O(2^N) problems.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

C++ is doomed wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 11:04 +0800
  Re: C++ is doomed Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 11:47 +0200
  Re: C++ is doomed David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2024-08-28 11:36 +0000
    Re: C++ is doomed wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 20:24 +0800
      Re: C++ is doomed wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 20:53 +0800
    Re: C++ is doomed Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 20:13 -0700
      Re: C++ is doomed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 18:29 -0700
        Re: C++ is doomed Mad Hamish <newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au> - 2024-08-30 17:24 +1000
          Re: C++ is doomed Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-08-30 12:56 +0300
            Re: C++ is doomed wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 20:26 +0800
              Re: C++ is doomed wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 20:28 +0800
          Re: C++ is doomed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 12:46 -0700
        Re: C++ is doomed jseigh <jseigh_es00@xemaps.com> - 2024-08-30 11:26 -0400
          Re: C++ is doomed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 12:48 -0700
  Re: C++ is doomed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 18:28 -0700
    Re: C++ is doomed geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 23:35 -0400
      Re: C++ is doomed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-08-28 21:16 -0700
      Re: C++ is doomed Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-08-29 09:44 +0300
      Re: C++ is doomed Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-08-29 11:01 +0200
        Re: C++ is doomed "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-08-29 12:37 -0700
          Re: C++ is doomed Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-08-30 00:34 +0300
    Re: C++ is doomed Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-08-29 20:33 -0400
      Re: C++ is doomed jseigh <jseigh_es00@xemaps.com> - 2024-08-30 11:32 -0400
  Re: C++ is doomed Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-29 09:38 -0400
  Re: C++ is doomed Mad Hamish <newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au> - 2024-08-30 17:22 +1000
    Re: C++ is doomed Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-08-30 12:51 +0300
    Re: C++ is doomed wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-08-30 20:18 +0800
  Re: C++ is doomed Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2024-09-01 21:04 +0100

csiph-web