Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #29890

Re: Interrupts: can be lost?

Show all headers | View raw

On 30/7/20 2:16 pm, Rick C wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 9:04:47 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:
>> On 30/7/20 10:46 am, Rick C wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 8:04:29 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:
>>>> On 30/7/20 9:47 am, Rick C wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 5:57:54 PM UTC-4, Chris wrote:
>>>>>> The whole idea is to design assuming that the hardware will change
>>>>>> over time, new requirements, performance, cost, whatever, as new
>>>>>> micros come to market. The exact opposite of s design frozen in
>>>>>> time, with all the hassle that involves...
>>>>> Ok, I get it.  You don't understand requirements.  There are perfectly valid reasons for wanting second sources on parts that obviously have never applied on projects you've worked on.  So you don't understand why anyone will need that requirement.
>>>>
>>>> Even with a strict second-source policy, actually validating the device
>>>> after with the second source will require some additional work. Do
>>>> product managers require validation of correct operation with any second
>>>> source *before* they need to switch to it? Because if not, they should
>>>> expect the possibility of additional work (including minor code changes)
>>>> when they do decide to switch. All of which means that in many or most
>>>> cases, it's entirely possible to consider the GD32 chips as a second
>>>> source for the STM32 ones.
>>>
>>> Of course they would verify the second source worked.  I designed a board I expected to be making for some time.
>> [snip]
>>
>> Nice work.
>>
>>> Having choices in parts purchasing can extend the life of a produce or keep it affordable.
>>
>> And so the GD32 parts could likewise be validated as a second source for
>> STM32, contrary to your earlier claim.
> 
> Hardly.  From what I believe you have written, they have had several issues of non-compatibility

I don't know that. But it has been an issue with chips that have been 
cloned in a similar way, for example the AVR-like chips that aren't from 
Atmel. Yet the majority of Arduino sketches (yuk, child's play, 
admittedly) still "just work". The differences are known and can be 
worked around, to write code that works on both authentic and cloned chips.

I also don't know (and doubt) that the clone chips have been revised, 
but as long as you buy the correct version, there's no problem.

> For many uses, no changes are allowed because potentially no longer meeting some spec.

If you validate the design on two different chips, and can continue to 
acquire the same versions, then there should be no problem.

> If you have a serious need for a component that will meet all specifications for an extended period of time Chinese knockoffs are not a second source.

Wake up sunshine! Almost all the "US" chips are now made in China. One 
of the last hold-outs is Intel, and they're falling behind. You'll need 
to take early retirement if you refuse to use Chinese chips.

CH

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Interrupts: can be lost? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 00:38 +0200
  Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-08 09:11 +1000
    Re: Interrupts: can be lost? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 08:13 +0200
      Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-08 09:13 +0200
  Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-07 16:14 -0700
    Re: Interrupts: can be lost? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 08:16 +0200
      Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 06:55 -0700
  Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-08 09:02 +0200
    Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2020-07-08 11:43 +0300
      Re: Interrupts: can be lost? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 12:24 +0200
        Re: Interrupts: can be lost? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2020-07-09 23:24 +0000
          Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2020-07-09 17:13 -0700
          Re: Interrupts: can be lost? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-07-10 08:09 +0200
            Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 23:39 -0700
            Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-10 08:59 +0200
      Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2020-07-08 14:57 +0300
        Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:01 -0700
          Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-08 16:07 +0200
            Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 07:35 -0700
              Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-09 14:16 +0200
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 11:04 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2020-07-09 14:32 -0400
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-07-09 11:47 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? lasselangwadtchristensen@gmail.com - 2020-07-09 15:22 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2020-07-09 15:35 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 18:41 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-10 16:01 +1000
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 23:28 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-07-29 19:44 +0100
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 13:23 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-07-29 22:57 +0100
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 16:47 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-30 10:04 +1000
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 17:46 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-30 11:04 +1000
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 21:16 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-07-30 16:36 +1000
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-31 11:26 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-07-30 01:11 +0100
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-29 17:53 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-07-30 19:05 +0100
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-07-31 00:21 +0300
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-04 20:40 +0200
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-08-04 14:36 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-08-04 22:32 -0400
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-05 15:26 +0200
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-07-30 08:31 +0300
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2020-07-30 07:53 +0100
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-07-30 08:10 -0400
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 18:40 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-10 09:09 +0200
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-10 01:41 -0700
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-10 13:47 +0200
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-07-11 13:41 +0300
          Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2020-07-08 17:33 +0300
            Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 09:31 -0700
              Re: Interrupts: can be lost? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-07-09 14:30 +0200
              Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Przemek Klosowski <przemek@tux.dot.org> - 2020-07-19 18:38 +0000
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2020-07-19 23:11 +0300
                Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2020-07-19 13:43 -0700
    Re: Interrupts: can be lost? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-07-08 13:19 +0200
  Re: Interrupts: can be lost? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-07-09 08:00 -0400
  Re: Interrupts: can be lost? dalai lamah <antonio12358@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-11 12:12 +0200
    Re: Interrupts: can be lost? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-07-13 08:35 +0200

csiph-web