Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #424297
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book |
| Date | 2017-07-08 12:04 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <59612CD3.3D59@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <1aa232ad-849e-48a6-bcdd-d29acabedaee@googlegroups.com> <59605A34.6F64@ix.netcom.com> <596126E5.299A@ix.netcom.com> |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > > > > > The Hubble expansion of space occurs only in intergalactic space. Space inside galaxies isn't expanding because it's gravitationally bound. (Wheeler, Misner, Thorne,, Gravitation, p. 719). > > > > > > This uneven expansion of space should produce warps in space around galactic boundaries, and by relativity any warp in space is equivalent to a gravitational field. Thus these warps are the most reasonable explanation for the dark matter effect. > > > > > > There are several important advantages to this theory: > > > > > > 1: The warps occur around galactic boundaries precisely where the dark matter effect occurs. But once created such DM fields can move around under gravitational interactions just like galaxies do. > > > > > > 2. It's a simple parsimonious explanation based only on established principles of relativity and requires no new undiscovered particles beyond the Standard Model. > > > > > > 3. It's automatically dark because it's not particle based. > > > > > > 4. It interacts only through the gravitational force as DM is known to do. > > > > > > 5. It's consistent with recent evidence that there was less DM in the early universe (http://www.eso.org/public/usa/news/eso1709/) since as space continual > > > > > > 6. Over the history of the universe space has expanded by a large amount. This is consistent with the amount of DM estimated to be 5x that of ordinary matter. > > > > > > So all in all this new theory of DM seems extremely promising. It's also testable by running current DM distributions backwards to see where they originate. The Hubble warps must produce some gravitational effect. If it isn't DM then what else could it be? > > > > > > This is one of the many new theories to be found in my new book Universal Reality 2.0 available on Amazon under my name. > > > > > > Edgar L. Owen > > > > didn't anybody tell you that the reason you cannot see dark matter is because it doesn't exist???? > > You see, Albert Einstein built the atomic bomb BECAUSE he wanted to prove E=Mc^2 was REAL, and not 'just a theory'. > > He spent ten years working at a patent office seeing 'others' taking their ideas and making it Real. > > It kind of....rub off on him. http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New Dark Matter Theory - New book "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-06 16:28 -0700
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-07 21:06 -0700
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 11:39 -0700
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 12:04 -0700
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-10 09:33 -0500
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-10 08:32 -0700
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-11 10:42 -0500
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-11 14:51 -0700
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-11 23:17 -0500
Re: New Dark Matter Theory - New book "Edgar L. Owen" <Edgar@edgarlowen.com> - 2017-07-12 02:52 -0700
csiph-web