Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #5946

Re: BASIC oddity?

From Martin <News03@avisoft.f9.co.uk>
Subject Re: BASIC oddity?
Newsgroups comp.sys.acorn.programmer
Date 2020-01-08 23:51 +0000
Message-ID <582f5b3ce2News03@avisoft.f9.co.uk> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <60432a2e58.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> <4ad6842e58.Matthew@sinenomine.freeserve.co.uk> <582e9297f8News03@avisoft.f9.co.uk> <893aa72e58.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> <bc36062f58.Matthew@sinenomine.freeserve.co.uk>
Organization None

Show all headers | View raw


On 08 Jan in article <bc36062f58.Matthew@sinenomine.freeserve.co.uk>,
   Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I hope you can both agree that BASIC is inconsistent between
> add/sub and multiplication.  

[Snip]

> If BASIC gave you access to the overflow and carry indicators or
> allowed you to declare variables as signed or unsigned it would be
> better.  However, we have to live with it as it is: I'm certainly
> not advocating changing it.

I agree it is inconsistent, but unless BASIC magically gains a
(backwards compatible) means of typing signed integers different from
unsigned, I am afraid we are stuck with it. 

The only way I can think of is to add a new Function keyword which
after and add or subtract returned the 4 possible flags for
Signed/Unsigned Underflow/Overflow. But I am not sure if it would be
any real use.

-- 
Martin Avison 
Note that unfortunately this email address will become invalid
without notice if (when) any spam is received. 

Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

BASIC oddity? Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2020-01-03 17:16 +0000
  Re: BASIC oddity? Martin <News03@avisoft.f9.co.uk> - 2020-01-03 19:31 +0000
    Re: BASIC oddity? druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2020-01-03 21:00 +0000
      Re: BASIC oddity? Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2020-01-03 22:26 +0000
        Re: BASIC oddity? Steve Drain <steve@kappa.me.uk> - 2020-01-04 10:40 +0000
          Re: BASIC oddity? Martin <News03@avisoft.f9.co.uk> - 2020-01-04 16:08 +0000
            Re: BASIC oddity? Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2020-01-04 16:22 +0000
              Re: BASIC oddity? David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2020-01-04 17:24 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2020-01-04 18:47 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2020-01-06 08:58 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2020-01-06 16:20 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2020-01-07 08:49 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Martin <News03@avisoft.f9.co.uk> - 2020-01-07 11:20 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2020-01-07 15:05 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Matthew Phillips <spam2011m@yahoo.co.uk> - 2020-01-08 08:23 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2020-01-08 10:26 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2020-01-08 21:02 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2020-01-09 12:53 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2020-01-09 23:16 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2020-01-08 22:35 +0000
                Re: BASIC oddity? Martin <News03@avisoft.f9.co.uk> - 2020-01-08 23:51 +0000
          Re: BASIC oddity? Steve Drain <steve@kappa.me.uk> - 2020-01-10 11:30 +0000
            Re: BASIC oddity? Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2020-01-10 12:38 +0000
      Re: BASIC oddity? Jean-Michel <jmc.bruck@orange.fr> - 2020-01-06 20:39 +0100
        Re: BASIC oddity? Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2020-01-06 21:13 +0000
          Re: BASIC oddity? Steve Drain <steve@kappa.me.uk> - 2020-01-08 12:46 +0000

csiph-web