Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other.

Message-ID	<57AA3EA1.340C@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-08-09 13:35 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other.
References	(2 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.8{4.23P.Seattle.2016}> <e0tcb5F5cdtU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.9{2.24A.Seattle.2016}> <57AA2A56.3397@ix.netcom.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.9{0.30P.Seattle.2016}>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > >   _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past;
> > >   the (4d) TimeScape is static.  The more ignorant you are,
> > >   the more you (erroneously) believe in "free will".
> > >
> > >   We were programmed by nature to breathe, drink, etc.
> >
> > Who is programming Nature?
> 
> No one; intrinsically, the (4d) TimeScape is static.
> 
> Virtually, however, everything is spontaneously consuming
> "eXergy" ( energy that can do work );
> the Sun does it, we do it, as does the entire cosmos.


Okay, then what type of computer is nature using to program us to breathe, drink, etc.? Or which version of Windows is nature using??

Thread

Re: QM and GR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-07-22 22:39 -0500
  Re: QM and GR. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-23 08:14 +0200
    Re: QM and GR. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 10:43 -0500
      Re: QM and GR. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 13:29 -0700
        Re: QM and GR. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 17:24 -0400
          Re: QM and GR. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 05:00 -0700
    Re: QM and GR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-07-23 12:33 -0500
      Re: QM and GR. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-23 22:41 +0200
        Re: QM and GR. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-24 07:12 +0200
        Re: QM and GR. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-26 09:21 +0200
      Re: QM and GR. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-27 07:11 +0200
    Re: QM and GR. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 10:11 -0700
  Re: QM and GR. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-25 16:45 +1000
    Re: QM and GR. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-25 16:46 +1000
    Re: QM and GR. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:08 +0200
    Re: QM and GR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-07-25 12:28 -0500
      that & this noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:46 -0700
        Re: that & this noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 19:21 -0700
      Re: QM and GR. wugi <brol@brol.be> - 2016-07-26 12:11 +0200
        Re: QM and GR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-07-27 12:11 -0500
          Re: QM and GR. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-29 10:20 +0200
            Re: QM and GR. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 07:13 -0500
            so sad, that M. is known only for his slogan about a mere phase-space noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:03 -0700
              lightcone(s brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:18 -0700
            Re: The rate at which the time axis grows, relative to the spatial dimensions. Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-07 15:36 +0000
            Re: The rate at which the time axis grows, relative to the spatial dimensions. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-07 12:31 -0500
              Re: The rate at which the time axis grows, relative to the spatial dimensions. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-08 06:57 -0500
            Re: The rate at which the time axis grows, relative to the spatial dimensions. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 07:18 +0200
              Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-08 11:02 -0700
                Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-08 13:14 -0500
                Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-08 13:07 -0700
              Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-08 13:05 -0700
              Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 22:52 +0200
                Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 15:11 -0700
                Re: Nature decides _everything_. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-09 08:42 +0200
                Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 12:09 -0700
                Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 12:54 -0700
                Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 13:35 -0700
                Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 13:38 -0700
                Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-09 23:53 +0200
                da tum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:06 -0700
                Re: Nature programmed you to choose one over the other. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 18:17 -0400
                Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-09 06:51 -0500
                Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 17:51 -0400
                Re: Nature decides _everything_. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-09 14:40 -0700

csiph-web