Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #434512

Re: [OT]

Message-ID <56D7D80A.3E2B@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-03-02 22:22 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups alt.2600, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: [OT]
References (4 earlier) <56D4C9D5.22A7@ix.netcom.com> <nb3st2$i9h$7@dont-email.me> <56D614AF.3226@ix.netcom.com> <nb6reb$nmp$2@dont-email.me> <55963610-2b1d-4d2b-9941-7494a0f356bc@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Peter Trei wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 8:59:31 AM UTC-5, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> > On 3/2/2016 6:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > If there is a lock, there's a key.
> 
> Keys can be destroyed.
> The there is a lock, but no key.


Then you call the locksmith...and he'll make you a key.

Let's not forget the definitions of a key...

 a means of gaining or preventing entrance.


You cannot destroy    'means of gaining  entrance'





> 
> > There is irreversible encryption! :)
> 
> If its irreversible, its no longer encryption. There are irreversible
> operations in the cryptographer's tool kit; hashes and digests.
> But they aren't encryption.
> 
> pt

Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 09:18 -0800
  Re: unloock a phone Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 09:58 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 10:40 -0700
  Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:08 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 10:58 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 14:25 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 22:32 -0500
          Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 22:00 +1100
        Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:27 -0800
          Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:28 -0800
            Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:29 -0800
              Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 14:40 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:55 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:40 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-21 16:46 -0700
  Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 12:08 +1100
    Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 06:10 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 17:37 +0100
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-29 11:24 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 16:50 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-02-29 19:52 +0000
      Re: unloock a phone Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-02-29 13:14 -0800
        Re: unloock a phone Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> - 2016-02-29 17:19 -0800
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 23:30 +0800
    Re: [OT] Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 17:53 -0500
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:17 +0800
    Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 19:59 -0800
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:19 +0800
        Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 14:44 -0800
          Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:53 +0800
            Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:16 -0800
              Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:46 +0800
                Re: [OT] Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:17 -0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 22:22 -0800
                Re: [OT] Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 06:38 -0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:24 -0800
  [OT] Go misc.phone.mobile.iphone "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:58 +0800
  Re: unloock a phone, NO< its about them unlocking everyone's phones tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:27 -0700

csiph-web