Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #498277
| Message-ID | <557360EA.3369@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-06-06 14:06 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: the most spectacular scientific fraud in a generation |
| References | <55734A04.741B@ix.netcom.com> <55735DEA.2C16@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Last year UCLA political science grad student and maybe soon-to-be > > Princeton professor Michael LaCour released stunning findings from a > > field trial on gay marriage called “When Contact Changes Minds.” He > > found that a 20-minute conservation with a house-to-house canvasser > > could convert huge numbers of opponents into supporters, at least if the > > canvassers explained they were gay and told personal stories. > > > > The study quickly became a media sensation, the most talked-about > > poli-sci paper in years, and it led gay-rights activists including some > > working on the Ireland referendum to retool their voter outreach. > > > > The problem is that Mr. LaCour stands accused of faking everything from > > start to finish. Ph.D. candidates at Berkeley David Broockman and Josh > > Kalla tried but failed to replicate Mr. LaCour’s results. They then > > noticed unusual statistical irregularities in Mr. LaCour’s survey panel. > > He now says he pulled a Hillary Clinton and deleted his raw data. But > > the canvassing firm he claimed to have employed has never heard of the > > project—and there is no proof anyone was ever contacted, much less > > changed their minds. > > > > "accused of faking everything from start to finish" > > > > "unusual statistical irregularities" > > > > all you guys are a bunch of crooks...if you stand behind him. > > "Mr. LaCour denies wrongdoing" > > Of course, 'faking everything from start to finish' is not wrong, or > doing it wrong....it may be illegal, a fedral offence, but > it isn't ....wrongdoing. > > Murder isn't wrongding.. > Stealing isn't wrongdoing.. > > maybe illegal...but certaintly not wrong.. > > You guys call it...'doing it right.' > > "unusual statistical irregularities"... is 'doing it right.', isn't it? > > .."faking everything from start to finish" is 'doing it right.', isn't > it??? > > Fuck the illegal...the illegal we do imeadately, the doing it right > takes a little longer to do.. "Mr. LaCour’s purported findings let them claim that science had proved them right. " https://www.google.com/#q=Scientific+Fraud+and+Politics+Look+who+is+lecturing+Republicans+about+scientific+truth. "...science had proved them right." That's a create con line you guys use all the time...."science had proved them right". I hear it, time and time again.... Science is...faking everything from start to finish. This is a fake: All the white areas have been *grayed out* except for.... http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/thumbnails/image/pia19559-1041.jpg?itok=liOhRvPZ "faking everything from start to finish" Okay, I want all you crooks arrested, then you can hang yourself in jail...
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the most spectacular scientific fraud in a generation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-06 12:29 -0700
Re: the most spectacular scientific fraud in a generation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-06 13:54 -0700
Re: the most spectacular scientific fraud in a generation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-06 14:06 -0700
Re: the most spectacular scientific fraud in a generation "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-06-06 18:05 -0700
Re: the most spectacular scientific fraud in a generation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-07 00:07 -0700
csiph-web