Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: can this be done recursively |
| Date | 2015-04-22 16:12 -0400 |
| Organization | Self |
| Message-ID | <5538009B.9090306@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b0319922-1b5e-48d2-8cc7-5cd1a5e866e6@googlegroups.com> <e07362d0-5d7e-4243-acc6-bcf384298b69@googlegroups.com> <87egnc9brp.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
On 04/22/2015 03:57 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: ... > There's also a technicality: ch should be declared to be int not char. > EOF is a negative integer value ... Correct. > ... guaranteed to be different from any > actualy character value that getchar can legitimately return. Citation, please? I found no such guarantee in the definition of EOF (7.21.1p3) nor in the definition of getchar() (7.21.7.6). In the unlikely event that UCHAR_MAX > INT_MAX, getchar()'s definition combined with the reversibility requirements for I/O on binary streams (7.21.2p3) imply that getchar() must return EOF when reading a byte that was written by calling putchar(EOF).
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-19 09:50 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-04-19 21:14 +0100
Re: can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-19 14:20 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-04-19 16:32 -0400
Re: can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-19 14:25 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-04-19 14:09 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-19 14:35 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2015-04-19 22:57 +0000
Re: can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 04:30 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-04-20 12:49 +0100
Re: can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 05:28 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2015-04-20 13:09 +0000
Re: can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-22 09:42 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-04-22 10:12 -0700
Re: can this be done recursively James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-04-22 13:29 -0400
Re: can this be done recursively Ben Bacarisse <ben.lists@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-04-22 20:57 +0100
Re: can this be done recursively James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-04-22 16:12 -0400
Re: can this be done recursively Ben Bacarisse <ben.lists@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-04-22 23:14 +0100
Re: can this be done recursively James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-04-22 18:56 -0400
Re: can this be done recursively G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 07:59 -0700
csiph-web