Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #55893

Re: Is this poor style?

From raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos)
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Is this poor style?
Date 2015-01-05 12:58 +0000
Organization Go wash your mouth.
Message-ID <54aa8a20.9386265@news.xs4all.nl> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <m8bmb9$cg3$1@news.albasani.net> <57491de8-6480-47d1-b876-86236262e3da@googlegroups.com> <Y_kqw.363096$be7.149990@fx14.am4> <Dolqw.330807$fX6.290031@fx26.am4> <3%lqw.487760$tr6.370454@fx15.am4>

Show all headers | View raw


Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> wrote:

> BartC wrote:
> > On 05/01/2015 00:35, Richard Heathfield wrote:

> >> Whilst it is certainly true that I've heard that goto isn't good, I
> >> actually have personal experience of its not being good.
> > 
> > You might, nevertheless, prefer reading other people's code that uses
> > gotos sensibly and consistently, to alternates that involve tortuous
> > logic or where the action keep shifting to dozens of extra functions
> > (with the complicated interfaces required to allow them to share common
> > data).
> 
> In much the same way, I'd prefer to have my leg removed by a surgeon than by 
> an alligator. NEVERTHELESS, keeping the leg is still the best option.

Myeah, but some people get malignant tumors in their legs, or
necrotising fascitis, and amputation might be the only way to save your
life. In that case, I'd prefer a neat goto to a dirty use of do(0).

Richard

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this poor style? "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2015-01-04 00:46 +0000
  Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-03 16:58 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-04 20:37 +1300
      Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-04 02:32 -0800
        Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-05 09:39 +1300
          Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-04 22:53 +0000
  Re: Is this poor style? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-01-04 01:29 +0000
  Re: Is this poor style? Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-01-04 00:00 -0600
    Re: Is this poor style? Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-01-04 02:20 -0600
  Re: Is this poor style? August Karlstrom <fusionfile@gmail.com> - 2015-01-04 15:46 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2015-01-04 15:10 +0000
      Re: Is this poor style? August Karlstrom <fusionfile@gmail.com> - 2015-01-04 17:06 +0100
  Re: Is this poor style? Clark Smith <noaddress@nowhere.net> - 2015-01-04 15:30 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-04 07:44 -0800
      Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 00:35 +0000
        Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-05 01:02 +0000
          Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 01:43 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-05 11:35 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-01-05 12:58 +0000
              Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 13:14 +0000
          Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-05 22:02 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-05 14:24 -0800
              Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-06 12:26 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-06 02:40 -0800
              Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-07 19:32 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-07 20:03 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-07 20:27 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 09:55 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-01-07 18:13 -0600
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 13:17 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-07 21:02 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:22 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:33 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 13:08 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 12:54 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-01-08 14:04 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-01-07 13:57 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-01-07 18:12 -0600
                Re: Is this poor style? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-01-07 20:56 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-07 21:18 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-01-07 21:28 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-06 11:28 +0000
              Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-07 20:19 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-07 16:05 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-01-08 08:29 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-12 22:08 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 20:35 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-25 08:43 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 16:38 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-03-26 15:43 -0500
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-28 08:57 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 13:23 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-07 16:53 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 14:11 +1300
              Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 11:10 +1300
        Re: Is this poor style? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-01-05 15:54 -0800
          Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-06 11:03 +0100
            Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-06 11:10 +0100
            Re: Is this poor style? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 06:03 -0800
              Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-06 14:44 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-01-06 09:10 -0600
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:14 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:31 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 13:06 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 13:19 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 12:53 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-08 05:49 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-01-08 08:18 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-09 07:58 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 09:28 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-24 13:57 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 08:28 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-25 12:17 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2015-04-05 17:03 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-01-14 11:25 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-14 19:41 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-15 09:01 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-15 09:35 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-01-04 11:15 -0500
      Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-04 21:38 +0000
      Re: Is this poor style? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2015-01-05 07:27 +0000
        Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-05 06:33 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? Vincenzo Mercuri <nomail@yahoo.it> - 2015-01-04 18:56 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? rouben@shady.(none) (Rouben Rostamian) - 2015-01-04 18:22 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-01-04 21:35 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-05 10:46 +1300
      Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-04 15:36 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 12:05 -0800
      Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 14:18 -0800
        Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 14:32 -0800
          Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 14:37 -0800
        Re: Is this poor style? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-01-05 18:23 -0500
          Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 23:32 +0000
      Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-01-05 15:31 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2015-01-13 15:00 +0200
  Re: Is this poor style? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-01-04 15:07 -0600
  Re: Is this poor style? jadill33@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 15:03 -0800
  Re: Is this poor style? buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 21:48 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:21 +0100
      Re: Is this poor style? buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 12:42 +0100
  Re: Is this poor style? "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2015-01-08 15:29 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-01-08 12:03 -0500

csiph-web