Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #240646

Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long...

Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date 2014-04-28 09:12 -0700
References <265f45b9-8390-4aa6-ad3c-6c32c38ffa03@googlegroups.com> <ljlj3g$ds5$3@dont-email.me> <CF83BD18.35E38%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <87k3a9pj08.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID <526ec327-653c-4dfd-845e-c8e3d40f87a7@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long...
From Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Monday, April 28, 2014 9:32:23 AM UTC-6, Hadron wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> 
> 
> 
> > On 4/28/14, 5:55 AM, in article ljlj3g$ds5$3@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
> 
> > <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> >> On 2014-04-27 10:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> >>> Apparently I'm the only one who noticed that while Snit *claims* to have me
> 
> >>> killfile he has unquestionably been reading the posts from the person forging
> 
> >>> me since Oct. of 2012 using the fretwizzen gmail handle, the person he
> 
> >>> falsely claims is me. If he believes it's me "forging" myself (like that idea
> 
> >>> even makes any sense) why has he not killfiled the version of 'me' when I'm
> 
> >>> *allegedly* using these other email addresses?
> 
> >>> 
> 
> >>> I can feel the stakes being driven into the ground right now, the smell of
> 
> >>> elephant dung and the sound of a machine as its loaded with large sacks of
> 
> >>> popcorn ;)
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> None of us pays attention to Snatch the Clown long enough to really
> 
> >> notice anything that is even remotely associated with him. Even when we
> 
> >> don't have him killfiled, we only skim through his 7,000 word articles
> 
> >> because, in his own words, he's not that interesting.
> 
> >
> 
> > You obsess over me. You, Carroll, GreyCloud, and Flatfish. Over and over. It
> 
> > is weird.
> 
> 
> 
> The use of "We" is somewhat telling. A need to belong. A bit like a counter-Creepy.

It's "interesting" that you focus on something like that while somehow managing to miss the larger point that these 'fretwizzen' forgeries are almost assuredly being done by Snit. I actually waited (for 20 months, I spotted it immediately) to point this out so it would be *damn* obvious to everyone who ever read a Snit post, even *damn* obvious to Snit apologists like you. Your reply here (and Snit's non response) are "evidence" that he's the likely culprit and you're overlooking it for some strange reason. 

Fact: Snit has not only forged my name (and others) before he has admitted to doing so in my case and I have pointed to the post where he did this, I even did so many times on COLA. You know this, yet,  you continue to turn a blind eye.

Fact: The "evidence" mentioned in this post (and Snit's admission mentioned above) is far stronger than the BS you spew about his quotes list being comprised of posts mostly written by me. 

ALERT!!! If you are reality adverse avoid the following!!!

Clue for the clueless: Snit can't play 'vicitm' if he was consistent and, you know, killfiled the version of 'me' that allegedly uses the 'fretwizzen' gmail address, like he has *claimed* to do with my gmail address (fretwizzer). 

Bigger clue: There is *nothing* difficult to understand about this, it's *the* reason Snit's BS fails *every* time, only an idiot or a puppet/shill would miss it after it's been pointed out repeatedly.

 How much evidence do you need, "Hadron"? Obviously *none* where I am concerned... meanwhile, an admission *by Snit* himself that he is a forger isn't good enough for you! 

You want everyone to believe you're not an idiot... explain what's wrong with this picture, "Hadron".

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 19:58 -0700
  Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 08:55 -0400
    Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 08:08 -0700
      Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 17:32 +0200
        Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 08:55 -0700
          Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 09:19 -0700
        Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 09:12 -0700
          Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 12:34 -0400
            Re: OT: Surprised no one caught this for so long... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-28 12:51 -0700

csiph-web