Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #29028

Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler

From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler
Date 2012-12-07 12:25 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <50C2269F.4070309@verizon.net> (permalink)
References <k9s3j1$c1s$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <k9spjv$8cb$1@dont-email.me> <k9t2lc$c83$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <50C21829.9090705@verizon.net> <k9t7ff$h2c$1@node1.news.atman.pl>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/07/2012 12:02 PM, Borneq wrote:
> Użytkownik "James Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> napisał w wiadomości 
> news:50C21829.9090705@verizon.net...
>> On 12/07/2012 10:40 AM, Borneq wrote:
>> Your title said "pure C". The __asm keyword is not pure C; nor is
>> anything that's microsoft-specific. There's nothing wrong with writing
>> microsoft-specific code, if you're willing to tie your code to
>> microsoft, but if you're willing to consider solutions of that type, you
>> should have changed the Subject: line accordingly, and you should have
>> posted your message to a forum specializing in programming for Win32.
> 
> Not exactly the I expressed what I have in mind. "Pure" - I think no C++ but 
> C, also assebler may be. It is interesting not only for Win32 (or Win64) but 
> also for Linux. 

Well, if it includes a assembler, you should not describe it as "pure
C". It would be more accurate to describe it as "C plus assembler".
If you're interested in a single solution that works for Linux as well
as Win32, the one you found at that Microsoft web site isn't that solution.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Exceptions handling in pure C "Borneq" <borneq@antyspam.hidden.pl> - 2012-12-07 07:50 +0100
  Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-12-07 20:42 +1300
    Re: Exceptions handling in pure C "Borneq" <borneq@antyspam.hidden.pl> - 2012-12-07 09:23 +0100
      Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-12-07 21:41 +1300
        Re: Exceptions handling in pure C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-12-07 03:10 -0600
          Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-12-08 07:44 +1300
            Re: Exceptions handling in pure C BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-12-07 17:26 -0600
        Re: Exceptions handling in pure C "Borneq" <borneq@antyspam.hidden.pl> - 2012-12-08 11:08 +0100
          Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-12-08 19:02 +0000
            Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-12-08 19:22 +0000
  Re: Exceptions handling in pure C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-07 08:06 -0500
    Re: Exceptions handling in pure C "Borneq" <borneq@antyspam.hidden.pl> - 2012-12-07 16:40 +0100
      Re: Exceptions handling in pure C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-07 11:24 -0500
        Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler "Borneq" <borneq@antyspam.hidden.pl> - 2012-12-07 18:02 +0100
          Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-07 12:25 -0500
          Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler "christian.bau" <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-07 09:29 -0800
            Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-12-08 12:46 +0000
              Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-08 09:35 -0500
              Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-12-08 12:08 -0600
                Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-12-08 15:19 -0600
              Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler Jonathan Leffler <jleffler@earthlink.net> - 2012-12-16 22:37 -0800
      Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Rosario1903 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2012-12-07 21:24 +0100
  Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-07 11:07 -0800
    Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler "Borneq" <borneq@antyspam.hidden.pl> - 2012-12-07 20:35 +0100
      Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-07 15:15 -0500
        Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler "Borneq" <borneq@antyspam.hidden.pl> - 2012-12-08 16:49 +0100
          Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-08 11:04 -0500
          Re: Exceptions handling in C + assembler Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-12-09 15:05 +0100
  Re: Exceptions handling in pure C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-12-08 10:34 -0800

csiph-web