Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: passing uninitialised data |
| Date | 2012-09-14 15:15 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <50538247.40507@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <k2vhbd$fhj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrnk56vs4.7fv.angel+news@pearlgates.net> |
On 09/14/2012 03:03 PM, Angel wrote: > On 2012-09-14, Mark <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have quite a generic question. Suppose we work with fwrite(), or sendto() >> (not C standard function, but I'll assume everyone knows it) or any other >> API that takes a pointer to a buffer to transmit. When such a buffer is >> unititialised, does it in some ways impose undefined behaviour? > > Passing a pointer to a function that expects such is well defined, no > matter if the object the pointer points to is initialized or not. There's a reason why valgrind is giving him warning messages about this. It's quite trivial to write code that has undefined behavior when passed a pointer to an uninitialized buffer. What precisely is encompassed by the phrase "that expects such"?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
passing uninitialised data "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-14 11:09 -0400
Re: passing uninitialised data Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-09-14 11:45 -0400
Re: passing uninitialised data James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-14 11:48 -0400
Re: passing uninitialised data Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-09-14 10:34 -0700
Re: passing uninitialised data James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-14 14:34 -0400
Re: passing uninitialised data Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-09-14 15:26 -0700
Re: passing uninitialised data James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-17 12:18 -0400
Re: passing uninitialised data Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-17 11:52 -0800
Re: passing uninitialised data pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-12-17 16:21 -0500
Re: passing uninitialised data Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-20 10:23 -0800
Re: passing uninitialised data pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-12-20 21:17 -0500
Re: passing uninitialised data Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-21 09:20 -0800
Re: passing uninitialised data pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-12-21 14:52 -0500
Re: passing uninitialised data glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-21 21:19 +0000
Re: passing uninitialised data Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-17 19:45 -0500
Re: passing uninitialised data Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-14 19:03 +0000
Re: passing uninitialised data James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-14 15:15 -0400
Re: passing uninitialised data Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-14 20:26 +0000
Re: passing uninitialised data James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-14 16:45 -0400
Re: passing uninitialised data Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-14 21:19 +0000
csiph-web