Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question |
| Date | 2012-08-28 15:34 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <503D1D4C.6060505@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <e03d454c-bb78-4a20-be1a-9d082c7e1748@googlegroups.com> <17a940de-ace8-4536-b8ac-e65366328836@googlegroups.com> <503BDC9D.9080008@verizon.net> <slrnk3q5lp.2lr.raka@scooter.fritz.box> |
On 08/28/2012 03:06 PM, Adrian Ratnapala wrote: > On 2012-08-27, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote: >> On 08/27/2012 04:35 PM, gdotone@gmail.com wrote: >> ... >>> printf ( "The address for a[%d][%d] is %p\n", i, j, &a[i][j] ); >> >> Whenever you print a pointer using "%p", the expression you print should >> have the type 'void*'. In all cases in this code, that would require a > > Is there really any reason to cast an (int *) into a (void *). The only > reason I could imagine is to keep your compiler quiet. The standard says that the behavior is undefined. It does so because there are real platforms out there where void* is incompatible with int*. For instance, on platforms where the word size is larger than than a byte, a void* must include information identifying the particular byte within a word where an object starts, because it might be required to point at an object smaller than a word. However, for word-aligned types, the pointer need only identify which word it starts at. There have been real machines where pointers to word-aligned types have been smaller than pointers to smaller types, for precisely this reason. It's also permissible for pointers of the same size to use different representations. I don't know of any examples, but I wouldn't recommend ruling out that possibility. Is that a good enough reason for you? If you're certain your code will never be used on such machines, you can ignore the issue - in which case someone, not necessarily you, will pay the price if your certainty turns out to be unjustified. If you do this, you'll have plenty of company.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question gdotone@gmail.com - 2012-08-24 08:28 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Adrian Ratnapala <adrian.ratnapala@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 08:41 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-24 12:01 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-24 11:10 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question gdotone@gmail.com - 2012-08-27 13:35 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-27 16:46 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Adrian Ratnapala <raka@scooter.fritz.box> - 2012-08-28 19:06 +0000
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-08-28 15:22 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-28 15:34 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-28 14:11 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-28 17:26 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-08-29 09:25 +0200
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Adrian Ratnapala <raka@scooter.fritz.box> - 2012-08-29 07:20 +0000
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 07:17 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Adrian Ratnapala <raka@scooter.fritz.box> - 2012-08-29 11:41 +0000
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-08-29 08:21 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 11:37 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2012-08-29 20:05 +0000
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-29 17:27 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 18:05 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-29 20:14 -0500
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-30 04:47 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-09-01 23:47 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-02 04:43 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-09-02 23:12 -0400
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question ais523 <ais523@nethack4.org> - 2012-08-30 11:35 +0000
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-30 11:17 -0500
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-30 13:52 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-08-30 23:13 +0200
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-31 16:37 -0500
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-08-27 19:45 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-27 20:40 -0700
Re: 2D arrays, pointers, and pointer arithmetic: question Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 06:28 -0700
csiph-web