Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing |
| Date | 2012-03-13 22:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4f5fc2c0.2214411696@text.giganews.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4f5ba2ed.1944110152@text.giganews.com> <4f5d0492.2034648234@text.giganews.com> <4f5d2fb5.2045691280@text.giganews.com> <m0hql7lc1fm81nrmj9lsnsq3jvo892acq0@4ax.com> |
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:34:41 -0700, Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> wrote: >On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:06:16 GMT, cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) wrote: > >>On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:01:23 GMT, cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:26:15 GMT, cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) wrote: >>> >>>I'm going to try this again with some background material. Maybe that >>>will help. >>[snip] >> >>There is an obvious bug. All are invited to point it out. >> >How about process IDs of source and destination of the message? >A unique message ID? A in-reply-to-message ID? None of these have to be in the message. The processing manager may keep this kind of information, but not the individual mini-processes. Incidentally the bug was in the calculation of the offset of the payload from char[1] array.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-10 19:26 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Don Y <this@isnotme.com> - 2012-03-10 12:57 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-03-10 14:12 -0800
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-10 23:31 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 13:06 +1300
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 00:44 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 14:15 +1300
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 04:46 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 21:27 +1300
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 17:23 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-12 10:01 +1300
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-13 21:18 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-14 10:23 +1300
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-03-11 11:59 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 16:51 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 07:32 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-13 21:46 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 07:28 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 08:13 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-13 21:51 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-10 14:21 -0800
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 01:40 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-11 14:11 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-13 21:56 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-14 14:55 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-15 21:55 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-19 13:33 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-03-10 15:21 -0800
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 00:47 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2012-03-11 01:07 -0800
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 16:14 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-03-11 13:47 +0100
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 16:24 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 21:01 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@wegge.dk> - 2012-03-12 00:05 +0100
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-13 21:57 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-11 23:06 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-11 17:34 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-13 22:00 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-13 18:12 -0700
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2012-03-14 03:38 +0000
Re: What is the right way to do this simple thing Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-14 00:49 -0700
csiph-web