Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #1586
| Subject | Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.programmer |
| From | Gavin <gav@dentrassis.com> |
| Date | 2012-04-07 13:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <4b74af7c52.Dentrassis@mail> (permalink) |
| References | <2cdb947852.Dentrassis@mail> <65389e7852.martin@bach.planiverse.com> |
| Organization | readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs |
In message <65389e7852.martin@bach.planiverse.com>
Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> wrote:
> In message <2cdb947852.Dentrassis@mail>
> Gavin <gc@dentrassis.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> But what I would like, if there is a simple way of doing it, is allow
>> the WIMP and the Filer to update between each file being processed,
>> when there is a selection of files all dragged in at the same time to
>> my app. I wondered if calling Wimp_PollIdle after processing a file
>> was the way to do it, to sort of force a null poll for other apps to
>> receive, but my app is receiving a sequence of data load messages that
>> have been queued up from the selection being dragged in, so I
>> immediately start processing the next file.
>> I'm wondering if a better approach is to build a list of all the files
>> to be processed when they are first dragged in, then work through that
>> list (and only start the processing) on the next null poll I receive.
> Yes, that looks like a good approach.
Yes, This is what I ended up doing.
Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
An easy way to let the WIMP update? Gavin <gc@dentrassis.com> - 2012-03-30 14:36 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-30 15:53 +0200
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-30 17:18 +0200
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Gavin <gav@dentrassis.com> - 2012-04-07 13:51 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2012-03-31 12:32 +0200
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 13:34 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2012-03-31 15:14 +0200
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-03-31 16:04 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:31 +0200
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-04-01 10:51 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Paul Sprangers <Paul@sprie.nl> - 2012-03-31 23:46 +0200
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Gerph <gerph@gerph.org> - 2012-03-31 07:32 -0700
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-31 23:19 +0200
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2012-04-01 14:25 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2012-04-01 22:09 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2012-04-02 08:21 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Alan Wrigley <spamhater@keepyourfilthyspamtoyourself.co.uk> - 2012-04-02 09:54 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Gerph <gerph@gerph.org> - 2012-04-01 07:16 -0700
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> - 2012-04-03 21:26 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Gavin <gav@dentrassis.com> - 2012-04-07 13:57 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-04-07 16:01 +0100
Re: An easy way to let the WIMP update? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-07 19:52 +0200
csiph-web