Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #39172
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: Marek Novotny Verification |
| Date | 2016-09-25 11:51 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <4ajkbd-e7t.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <xIadnXt4DN1QvnrKnZ2dnUU7-YXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <x-udnTm_78K7yXrKnZ2dnUU7-L2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <v66dnb-Hws-zynrKnZ2dnUU7-ROdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 2016-09-25 06:48, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-09-25, Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 01:09:33 +0000, Marek Novotny wrote: >> >>> There is an impostor posing as me here. >> >> That wasn't hard to figure out. The imposter is not smart >> enough to fool anyone. Everyone that knows you is aware of >> the fact that you use slrn not G00gle Gr0ups. And everyone >> knows your real email address. I didn't till today :-) > Yup... > > Question for you, and anyone else for that matter. Do you see value in > adding GnuPG signatures to your posts? Or is it overkill? > > If the guy reading the post isn't setup for verification then it seems > moot to me. Thoughts? I do that on email but didn't bother to do it here. The problem is that it is readers who have to verify the signature. I mean, an imposter can also create another PGP signature. We can know that each signature is different, but unless one keeps tracks of all signatures, as there is no organization for verification, it is problematic to authenticate. Another possibility are PKCS signatures. -- Cheers, Carlos.
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 01:09 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:15 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:17 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-24 23:35 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-24 21:48 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification F Volker <here@home.net> - 2016-09-25 12:22 +0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2016-09-25 08:41 +0300
Re: Marek Novotny Verification "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-25 11:51 +0200
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 13:37 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-09-25 10:29 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 13:42 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification jrg <connyank@cox.net> - 2016-09-25 08:07 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 15:09 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-25 05:56 -0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-25 09:56 -0500
Re: Marek Novotny Verification William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-09-25 11:51 +0100
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 13:40 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification F Volker <here@home.net> - 2016-09-26 05:49 +0700
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 10:50 +0000
Re: Marek Novotny Verification Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-09-26 06:47 -0400
csiph-web