Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #699731

Re: page1 TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Show all headers | View raw

page3

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:12:00 -0800 (PST)

Subject: radioactive Beta decay is 105 not .5 MeV Re: Chemists are smarter than
 Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real
 Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:12:00 +0000


radioactive Beta decay is it 105MeV or .5 MeV Re: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV

On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 3:36:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV 
> 
> 

So logically incoherent have Physicists become, so incoherent. Incoherent is a polite term for crazy, for physicists have become babbling crazy fools. 

They would have you believe that Beta decay in Radioactivity is the decay of electrons as .5 MeV particles. 

That means, the electric current in any electric wire is Radioactive beta decay. How silly is that?

So, do the babbling crazy fools ever consider that if Electrons = .5MeV, then a current in a wire is Radioactive Decay. Give me any 10 outstanding physicists today, any 10, and, even all put together have not one gram of Logical thought among them. 

If you think the electron is the .5MeV particle, then your radioactive decay is all messed up and screwy. 

If you think the Real Electron = 105 MeV, then, you have a modicum of a logical mind, because when the Real Electron = 105 MeV, it seldom ever comes out of its parent-atom. It seldom comes out unless you apply high energy to the atom to force it apart from its 840 MeV proton. Thus, when you have a neutral atom and force that atom to emit or eject a 105 MeV particle, then, then, you have Radioactive Beta Decay. 

But, the run of the mill photon with .5MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy, is not any Radioactive Decay. 

I am going to have to rewrite the entire textbook on Radioactive Decay.


AP

On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 1:08:56 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.physics:

direct observance some years back in Poland of a 840 Mev particle Re: True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV
2nd proof with the direct observance some years back in Poland of a 840 Mev particle along with 105 MeV particle of the hydrogen atom. 

Hello, well i found the below on the internet. I need a 840MeV particle that is the Real Proton. I have asked to look for it in the production of Muons. Is the below a production of muons along with 840 MeV particles? 

Quoting 

Indication For A Broad J(pc) = 2++ Meson At 840-mev Produced In The Reaction Pi- P ---> Pi+ Pi- N At High |t| 
K. Rybicki, I. Sakrejda (Cracow, INP) 
1985 - 10 pages 

Z.Phys. C28 (1985) 65-74 
DOI: 10.1007/BF01550250 
Abstract (Springer) 
The reaction π−p→π+π−n has been studied at 17.2 GeV/c and 63 GeV/c. A partial wave analysis shows a fairly broad (∼250 MeV) resonance at about 840 MeV. This object, already visible in moments of the angular distribution, is produced in theD wave with helicitym=2 via unnatural exchange. The cross section for the reaction π−p→D2U(840)n is only by an order of magnitude lower than that of ϱ(770) and falls likepLAB−2.1±0.3. We have not been able to explain this object by systematic experimental effects like acceptance and/orN* reflections; neither is the nature of the resonance (if real) clear to us. 
--- end quote --- 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 14:02 -0700
  Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-19 17:21 -0700
    Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-21 13:40 -0700
      Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 14:36 -0700
        Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 12:36 -0700
          Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 23:19 -0700
            Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 17:31 -0700
              Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-06 11:59 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-07 18:51 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 09:50 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-12 10:38 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-15 22:48 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 12:55 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 16:42 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 18:32 -0700
                Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-22 01:58 +0000
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 13:36 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 11:24 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 13:47 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:47 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 11:44 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 23:09 -0700
                Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 12:34 -0700
                page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 20:44 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 18:03 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 14:39 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 11:41 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 13:13 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 18:22 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 19:47 -0700
                Re: page1 TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Henrietta Foreskineater <invalid@example.com> - 2018-09-07 07:37 -0700
                Warren S. Warren, Harold Baranger of Duke Univ, boring and stupid??Richard L. McElroy, never wanting to consider and admit the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, Dirac's monopole=.5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 10:52 -0700
                Steffen Bass,Robert Behringer of Duke Univ, boring and stupid?? Richard L. McElroy, never wanting to consider and admit the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, Dirac's monopole=.5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 12:08 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 15:10 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 19:30 -0700
                Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 03:04 +0000
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 15:27 -0700
                Re: page1  TRUE CHEMISTRY-- 2018 Re: Edward Witten flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 14:13 -0700
                Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-20 22:57 +0000
                kibo-shein-stalkershitparade-Moroney loves AP's theory that Starpower is really just Faraday Law acting inside atoms. Does Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin love it also? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:30 -0700
                Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-25 12:52 +0000

csiph-web