Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286745
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 09:37 -0700 |
| References | (9 earlier) <D13D73F5.493D0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me> <D13DF49A.49411%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mfbk6m$4fp$2@dont-email.me> <D13EBD77.49467%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Message-ID | <4a5bf448-e83a-42d0-89db-58cde85ddc9a@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: NTFS is case-sensitive |
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 9:44:47 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 3/30/15, 6:48 AM, in article mfbk6m$4fp$2@dont-email.me, "DFS"
> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
> > On 3/29/2015 9:27 PM, Snit wrote:
> >> On 3/29/15, 6:22 PM, in article mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me, "DFS"
> >> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 3/29/2015 12:18 PM, Snit wrote:
> >>>> On 3/29/15, 8:06 AM, in article mf94c6$s6t$1@dont-email.me, "DFS"
> >>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> pwnage earned by changing the case of one letter? Epic!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> owl is a tricky bastard and it's hard to get one by him.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Congrats!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks. Wish I could say it was fully on purpose. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The plot thickens... you spelled it Owl by accident?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That would change it from Snit pwnage to owl self-nuke, and your trophy
> >>>>> must be returned.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fair enough. I humbly return the trophy... and grant Owl the mushroom cloud
> >>>> reward. :)
> >>>
> >>> It's good you came clean - 5 months later - but an 'honest and
> >>> honorable' man would've never let my assumption stand in the first
> >>> place. I always figured you intentionally wrote 'Owl' to try and trick
> >>> him, since you were in the middle of a case-sensitivity debate.
> >>>
> >>> Instead of admitting it right then, you took credit for it several times
> >>> when I brought it up as pwnage, and said "That was fun".
> >>>
> >>> Why did you finally admit it wasn't intentional?
> >>
> >> It was fun to see him self-nuke. Never implied it was intentional.
> >
> >
> > What? Of course you did, when you let stand many times my assumption
> > that you did it intentionally.
> >
> > It's just more of that 'honesty and honorableness' you're crammed full of.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> OK, your games get old
Right, this is *his* game, not yours... no one saw that coming! LOL!
> but by all means please quote where I did as you say.
It's implicit, you know, the other issue you have along with context (both of which have been pointed out many times).
> You will fail.
Not for people who can comprehend what they read.
> Then declare yourself the "winner". But go for it.
Whatever you say, "Chad Seymore"...
Snit:
"Gee, I point out your actions... am very specific and give a current
and relevant example... and you just whine and name call. Why not
"try to defend your actions, or, better yet, why don't you just stop
trolling and lying? Really - work on being honest like I am. It
would do you good."
ed:
"hey snit, since you seem to be giving much lip service to honesty and not
lying these days, would you like to go ahead and fess up to some of the lies
you've admitted to me in email, or perhaps you you won't mind me posting it
up? how about it? :D"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/bVedYXzPXy0/ngYJdnrNde8J
What Ebot got from your site as posted in the same thread:
-------
http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/csma/honor/
Honer and Honesty Code
The following people agree to treat each other with honor and honesty.
This does not imply that they will always agree, but that in
disagreements they will treat each other in ways that adhere to the
mutually agreed upon code.
The code is:
1 Be specific. Use the specific example of what it is you that
is bothering you. Vague complaints are hard to agree on, especially in a
forum like this.
2 Don't generalize. Avoid words like "never" or "always." Such
generalizations are usually inaccurate and will heighten tensions.
3 Don't stockpile. Storing up lots of grievances over time is
counterproductive. It's almost impossible to deal with numerous old
problems for which interpretations may differ. Try to deal with problems
as they arise.
4 Agree to let the past go.
These people have agreed to this pact, and should be held accountable to
treating each other based on the code.
CSMA Name Date Link
Snit 15 May 2004 Author
ed 30 Nov 2004 Pending arrival on Google
-------
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/%22Honer$20and$20honesty%22/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/bVedYXzPXy0
"Honer"?
Hmm, missed that before now. Was it done purposefully, so you could skirt out on a technicality? That actually wouldn't surprise me at all and you clearly know how to spell it (as shown in the URL).
You need a new schtick, "Chad", h&h isn't working.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:46 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 19:29 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 08:45 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 16:00 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:26 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 12:56 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 10:32 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 13:08 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 21:40 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 11:06 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:12 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 23:08 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 09:18 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:27 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 02:16 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:49 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:24 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 17:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:19 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 23:54 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 00:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 17:12 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:41 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:15 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:07 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 18:21 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:24 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:46 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:52 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:10 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:35 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:09 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 22:01 -0700
NTFS is not the best filesystem taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 18:52 -0700
Re: NTFS is not the best filesystem Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 22:51 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:48 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:44 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:37 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:50 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:14 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 17:09 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 00:24 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:26 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:09 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:06 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:15 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:28 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 18:35 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 12:57 +0000
csiph-web