Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #21915

Re: Why no warning?

From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Why no warning?
Date 2012-06-06 11:20 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <4FCF7523.5090406@verizon.net> (permalink)
References <6d2a019d-fea9-406d-9cda-e0d77566f4e6@googlegroups.com> <7o74a9-uea.ln1@spitzner.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/06/2012 10:57 AM, Ralph Spitzner wrote:
> Hill Pang wrote:
>> I was expecting a warning for this assignment, but can't get from GCC, why? isn't it an overflow?
>>
>> char c = 0xff;
> 
> You're basically setting c to -127, which is no legal offense :-p

He thought, for reasonable (but incorrect) reasons, that he was setting
c to 255. When there's a possible difference between common reasonable
(but incorrect) expectations and the way a compiler actually works, a
sufficiently good compiler should warn you, and gcc does do so. It just
needs the right options turned on to do so.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why no warning? Hill Pang <pangbw@gmail.com> - 2012-06-06 02:42 -0700
  Re: Why no warning? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-06-06 12:04 +0200
    Re: Why no warning? Hill Pang <pangbw@gmail.com> - 2012-06-06 03:17 -0700
      Re: Why no warning? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-06 06:29 -0400
        Re: Why no warning? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-06-06 12:54 +0200
  Re: Why no warning? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-06-06 12:28 +0200
    Re: Why no warning? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-06-06 12:55 +0200
      Re: Why no warning? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-06-06 13:17 +0200
  Re: Why no warning? Hill Pang <pangbw@gmail.com> - 2012-06-06 04:35 -0700
    Re: Why no warning? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-06 08:56 -0400
      Re: Why no warning? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-06-07 15:05 +0000
  Re: Why no warning? China Blue Max <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-06 04:53 -0700
    Re: Why no warning? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-06 13:29 +0100
      Re: Why no warning? Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-06-06 13:07 +0000
        Re: Why no warning? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-06 17:37 +0100
  Re: Why no warning? Ralph Spitzner <rasp@spitzner.org> - 2012-06-06 16:57 +0200
    Re: Why no warning? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-06 11:20 -0400
    Re: Why no warning? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-06 17:45 +0100

csiph-web