Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #18788

Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C

Message-ID <4F613025.6244@mindspring.com> (permalink)
Date 2012-03-14 18:56 -0500
From pete <pfiland@mindspring.com>
Organization PF
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C
References (17 earlier) <kfnpqdz1kwh.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <4F28C3E1.2C41@mindspring.com> <kfnk42vt3d7.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <4F5BB70E.84B@mindspring.com> <kfnobs0m7zy.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu>

Show all headers | View raw

Tim Rentsch wrote:
> 
> pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes:
> 
> > Tim Rentsch wrote:
> >>
> >> pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Tim Rentsch wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Tim Rentsch wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> [snip]
> >> >
> >> > If you're going to say for {char c;}
> >> >
> >> >>>     isalpha( * (unsigned char*) &c )
> >> >>>
> >> >>> rather than
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     isalpha(   (unsigned char )  c )
> >> >
> >> > then I think we should consider a case where
> >> >     ( * (unsigned char*) &c )
> >> > is different from
> >> >     (   (unsigned char )  c )
> >> > and the only case I can think of,
> >> > is where (c) is signed, negative and not twos complement.
> >>
> >> Right (ignoring padding bits in char, which no sane
> >> implementation has), although actually there is one other
> >> case, namely a two's complement trap representation.  Not
> >> very likely perhaps but it is allowed, so for the sake of
> >> completeness I think it should be mentioned.  (And now it
> >> has been...)
> >
> > Considering that file operations are at the root of this thread:
> >
> > If char is signed, and char c is assigned a value of (-1), as in
> >     char c;
> >     c = -1;
> >
> > and if (c) is written to a file using fputc,
> > then the value written into the file will be ((unsigned char)-1).
> >
> > If that same byte is read back from the same file using fgetc,
> > then the value returned by fgetc will be
> > ((int)(unsigned char)-1)
> > which is equal to ((unsigned char)c)
> > regardless of the representation of negative integers.
> >
> > The return value of fgetc will be unequal to
> > ( * (unsigned char*) &c )
> > when negative integers are either sign and magnitude
> > or one's complement.
> 
> That's right, of course.  Which form should be used depends
> on where the bytes came from in the first place -- if they
> had been written with fwrite(), for example, then the type
> punning form, rather than the ordinary converting form, is
> probably a better choice.  And conversely.
> 
> I suspect this is all a moot point anyway, since the values
> that might be affected most likely will all have the same
> characteristics vis-a-vis the <ctype.h> functions.  So I
> will just say thank you for an interesting discussion.

As far as the ctype functions go,
if you want use isalpha to give you some idea of 
whether or not putchar(c) is going to output an alpha,
then isalpha((unsigned char)c) is the way to do it,
because the value returned by putchar(c)
compares equal to ((unsigned char)c).

-- 
pete

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A very simple parser with scanf & C pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 07:03 -0700
  Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-09-23 18:28 +0100
  Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-23 18:29 +0100
    Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 23:16 +0200
      Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-24 00:09 +0100
        Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2011-09-24 09:32 +0200
  Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-23 21:24 +0100
    Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-23 22:00 +0100
      Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-24 00:04 +0100
        Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-24 00:34 +0100
          Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-24 01:00 +0100
            Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-24 02:42 +0100
              Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-24 12:13 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-24 12:25 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-24 15:05 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-24 14:45 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-24 17:45 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-24 22:21 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-25 00:52 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-25 01:54 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-25 02:51 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-25 12:22 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-09-25 01:35 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-25 08:41 -0400
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-09-25 11:23 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-09-25 19:41 +0300
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-25 19:45 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-25 12:10 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-25 20:43 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-09-25 15:55 -0400
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-26 11:07 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2011-09-26 11:40 -0400
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-26 12:22 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2011-09-26 21:19 +0000
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-26 16:11 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-26 23:26 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-26 12:18 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-09-27 02:27 +0300
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-27 10:06 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-27 21:10 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-09-26 22:59 +0000
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-30 05:18 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-30 17:06 +0100
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2011-09-25 18:05 -0400
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-25 15:30 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-24 14:01 -0800
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-25 11:05 -0500
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-31 16:01 -0800
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-31 23:47 -0500
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-08 09:21 -0800
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-03-10 15:18 -0500
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-13 15:49 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-03-14 18:56 -0500
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-15 17:37 -0700
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-03-17 00:24 -0500
                Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-21 05:21 -0700
    Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 23:23 +0200
      Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-23 23:53 +0100
  Re: A very simple parser with scanf & C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-09-25 14:07 +0100

csiph-web