Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <4EB95D9D.4ECE@mindspring.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-11-08 11:49 -0500 |
| From | pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> |
| Organization | PF |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Array of Integers ? |
| References | <4eb8df96$0$281$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <j9aocd$9b5$1@speranza.aioe.org> <f5be4501-1991-4e7d-b64a-3421b093dc67@s35g2000pra.googlegroups.com> |
Chad wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 12:14 am, jacob navia <ja...@spamsink.net> wrote:
> > Le 08/11/11 08:51, arnuld a écrit :
> >
> > > I wrote my blog on Insertion Sort some time back
> > > and used words "Array of
> > > Integers" on that. I was told by someone
> > > that there is nothing like array
> > > of integers in C. C has array of objects only.
> >
> > > So how do we differentiate between array of integers and array of
> > > characters (not string constant)
> > > in communication if there is no such
> > > thing as array of integers ?
> >
> > You define an array of integers like this:
> >
> > int array[256];
> >
> > The person that told you that arrays of
> > integers do not exist in C is
> > completely wrong.
> >
>
> What about the following...
>
> http://67.40.109.61/torek/c/expr.html
>
> And I quote..
>
> C does not have array values. (There is one
> exception to this, which I will save for later.)
Unless the case which is under discussion here and now,
happens to be the "one exception to this"
which he was saving for later,
he's wrong.
ISO/IEC ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E)
6.7.8 Initialization
Semantics
8 An initializer specifies the initial value stored in an object.
16 Otherwise, the initializer for an object
that has aggregate or union type shall be a brace
enclosed list of initializers for the elements or named members.
> The point being that, if I understand correctly, C does not have
> 'array of integers'. Instead, at least according to the former
> comp.lang.c regular on here, the language has 'array objects'.
Given, as above:
int array[256];
then (array), is an "array of 256 int".
ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E)
6.2.5 Types
17 The type char, the signed and unsigned integer types,
and the enumerated types are collectively called integer types.
20 An array type is said to be derived from its element type,
and if its element type is T, the array type is sometimes
called ‘‘array of T’’.
Since int is an integer type,
I don't see anything wrong
with calling (array) "an array of integers".
--
pete
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Array of Integers ? arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-11-08 07:51 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-11-08 08:11 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-08 09:14 +0100
Re: Array of Integers ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 00:23 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-11-08 04:07 -0500
Re: Array of Integers ? tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-11-08 06:23 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? "Scott Fluhrer" <sfluhrer@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-08 10:08 -0500
Re: Array of Integers ? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-11-08 16:25 +0100
Re: Array of Integers ? bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2011-11-08 15:39 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-08 13:48 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-09 19:34 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 06:59 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-08 22:48 +0100
Re: Array of Integers ? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 07:12 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-11-08 11:49 -0500
Re: Array of Integers ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-08 12:13 -0500
Re: Array of Integers ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-08 21:45 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-08 16:48 -0500
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-08 14:25 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-08 22:42 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-11-10 12:01 +0200
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-10 03:14 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-11-10 17:41 +0200
Re: Array of Integers ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-10 16:44 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-10 10:59 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-11-11 17:49 +0200
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-08 14:00 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-09 00:57 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-11-09 00:05 -0500
Re: Array of Integers ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-09 11:06 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-09 13:36 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-25 00:45 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-25 02:56 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-11-09 18:34 -0500
Re: Array of Integers ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-10 00:57 +0000
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-08 22:14 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-25 01:46 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-08 01:39 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-08 14:05 -0800
Re: Array of Integers ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-08 06:19 -0500
csiph-web