Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #586
| From | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue |
| Date | 2011-09-21 14:02 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4E79D246.E338E050@web.de> (permalink) |
| References | <3b312755-24d8-4505-8cfe-1644c458c4d5@j1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4E79BA45.B3622870@web.de> <2011092106580817537-ephisinowitz@yahoocom> |
Ephi Sinowitz wrote:
[...]
> Why I don't see any contention here. Just to ensure we are talking
> about the same thing. (The link in the original post was a little off.)
> http://www.1024cores.net/home/lock-free-algorithms/queues/intrusive-mpsc-node-based-queue
You posted
<quote>
void MPSC_Queue::push(void* item)
{
item->next = NULL;
void* old_head = InterlockedExchangePointer((void *volatile
*)&m_head, item);
// BLOCK POINT
old_head->next = item; // Do I need to ensure this is visible to
the consumer thread?
}
</quote>
which looks like mpscq_push() of non-intrusive version posted at
http://groups.google.com/group/lock-free/browse_thread/thread/55df71b87acb8201
<quote>
struct mpscq_node_t
{
mpscq_node_t* volatile next;
void* state;
};
struct mpscq_t
{
mpscq_node_t* volatile head;
mpscq_node_t* tail;
};
void mpscq_create(mpscq_t* self, mpscq_node_t* stub)
{
stub->next = 0;
self->head = stub;
self->tail = stub;
}
void mpscq_push(mpscq_t* self, mpscq_node_t* n)
{
n->next = 0;
mpscq_node_t* prev = XCHG(&self->head, n); // serialization-point
wrt producers
prev->next = n; // serialization-point wrt consumer
}
mpscq_node_t* mpscq_pop(mpscq_t* self)
{
mpscq_node_t* tail = self->tail;
mpscq_node_t* next = tail->next; // serialization-point wrt
producers
if (next)
{
self->tail = next;
tail->state = next->state;
return tail;
}
return 0;
}
</quote>
Intrusive version aside for a moment, lets start with non-intrusive
version....
To repeat:
You need to make prev->next = n store atomic-release store.
Consumer's next = tail->next load must be atomic-acquire load.
Producer's RMW can be totally relaxed with respect to memory barriers if
implemented as load-reserve/store-conditional or CAS loop (making
subsequent stores control-dependent).
OTOH, for loopless XCHG-style RMW you need to ensure that it has acquire
semantics (InterlockedExchangePointerAcquire in MS terms).
regards,
alexander.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 06:55 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 17:19 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 18:35 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephraim Sinowitz <ephisinowitz@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-21 06:42 -0400
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 00:26 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-09-21 12:19 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-09-21 12:34 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <ephisinowitz@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-21 06:58 -0400
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-09-21 14:02 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 06:08 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-09-21 15:18 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 06:56 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-09-21 17:06 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 09:16 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-09-21 18:20 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 09:58 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-09-21 19:33 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue dvyukov@google.com - 2011-10-02 04:13 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-10-04 12:15 +0200
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 11:04 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 11:17 -0700
Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-09-24 22:44 -0700
csiph-web