Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #191
| From | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: cond signal wait |
| Date | 2011-05-25 19:16 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4DDD3950.81DEDF32@web.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <87aaebte7o.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <98cd47de-73d9-48e9-ac18-cc01cac1bb48@z7g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <87lixubzfu.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <a05141df-cede-4929-9e8d-4b9394fd6858@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com> <87hb8ibwur.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> |
Anthony Williams wrote:
[...]
> void signaller()
> {
> lock mutex;
> // if we get here, waiter() hasn't yet executed **A**
> // or is blocked in **B**, so will be woken by signal
> // or has executed line **C** so doesn't care about signal
> mark data as ready;
> signal condvar;
> unlock mutex;
> }
lock mutex;
// if we get here, waiter() hasn't yet executed **A**
// or is blocked in **B**, so will be woken by signal
// or has executed line **C** so doesn't care about signal
mark data as ready;
unlock mutex;
signal condvar;
is the regular case.
signalling prior to unlock is special.
regards,
alexander.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
cond signal wait p6 c6d6 <p6c6d6@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 18:56 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 08:46 +0100
Re: cond signal wait p6 c6d6 <p6c6d6@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 05:44 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 15:57 +0100
Re: cond signal wait p6 c6d6 <p6c6d6@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 08:34 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 16:53 +0100
Re: cond signal wait Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-05-25 19:16 +0200
Re: cond signal wait David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-05-26 09:51 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 14:48 -0700
Re: cond signal wait David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-05-26 23:20 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-05-27 14:50 -0700
Re: cond signal wait David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-05-27 15:15 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-05-28 15:48 +0200
Re: cond signal wait Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-05-27 16:01 +0200
Re: cond signal wait David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-05-27 12:34 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-05-28 14:24 +0200
Re: cond signal wait David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-05-29 01:33 -0700
Re: cond signal wait Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-05-31 15:32 +0200
Re: cond signal wait David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-05-31 14:07 -0700
csiph-web