Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #120929
| From | wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released |
| Date | 2024-11-20 11:36 +0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <483ac6e312d3aa416d8a155cbc8661bcd58910da.camel@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <bda070a6eaad3e6c76ee6d026e5e5fdaf3ff138d.camel@gmail.com> <vhi9v9$1t36d$1@dont-email.me> <7e05636643d671e118187c137c1245156d95cc81.camel@gmail.com> <vhigab$1ud14$1@dont-email.me> |
On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 17:02 +0000, Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org wrote: > On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:55:07 +0800 > wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> boring babbled: > > On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 15:13 +0000, Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org wrote: > > > Pure wrapper functions/classes don't serve much purpose unless they do= > > =20 > > > something extra compared to just calling the API functions directly since > > > we're all capable of spending 5 mins putting fork() (or similar) into a c= > > lass > > > which is preferable to having a dependency on someones hobby library. > > > =20 > > > > Such kind of opinion has been around since 2005, so, it seems to be like= > > Why 2005? Similar comments were probably said about many libraries going back > to the birth of software libraries. > > > olcott's motto "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a tar= > > get=20 > > no one else can see." > > But, I mean the opposite, it is too obvious (like 0.999!=3D1, infinitesaml = > > exists > > in real number,...) for 'educated' people to see it. You have to try it to = > > know > > (and compare it with c++ std library). Or, try build such kind of library b= > > y > > your own to understand. > > Trying to make out you're some kind of genius when you receive some mild > criticism really doesn't do you any favours and just makes you sound like an > arrogant ass. For now, it seems I am more open to criticism than you are. What can I get from your criticism? I explained that your criticism has been around for 20 years, sth I missed? What is your criticism exactly? > > > > libwy does not support stream I/O (may be considered a defect), but it cont= > > ains=20 > > a class RdBuf which handles 'stream' better than any library I know of. > > Which begs the question of how many libraries do you know of. Several, five maybe.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
libwy-0.69.3 is released wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-11-19 21:05 +0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-11-19 21:21 +0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org - 2024-11-19 15:13 +0000
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 00:55 +0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org - 2024-11-19 17:02 +0000
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 11:36 +0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 07:42 +0100
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org - 2024-11-20 08:22 +0000
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 23:20 +0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-11-21 00:17 +0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 13:31 -0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-11-20 13:32 -0800
Re: libwy-0.69.3 is released Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org - 2024-11-20 16:40 +0000
csiph-web