Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #9797
| Subject | Re: Tracker |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| From | Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> |
| Date | 2015-10-12 13:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <47db681155.Alan.Adams@iyonix.adamshome.org.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <fe90551155.Alan.Adams@iyonix.adamshome.org.uk> <mvg8f1$khs$1@dont-email.me> |
| Organization | Orpheus Internet Services |
In message <mvg8f1$khs$1@dont-email.me>
Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:20:05 +0100, Alan Adams wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am wondering whether a pi would make a good basis for a tracker? What
>> I need is:
>>
>> find its position by GPS send position by SMS message every 30 minutes 5
>> days battery life weight no more than 500 grams.
>>
<snip>
> Have you talked to any of the HAB (high altitude balloon) enthusiasts?
> They know a lot about lightweight tracking systems and regularly fly
> RaspberryPi model As.
I've seen some discussion here about that topic.
> When you sat 'tracker', is this just a recorder, or does it also include
> a transmitter?
It needs to transmit the position, as a mobile phone text message. It
can be pure GPS coordinated, as there's an i-Phone app to convert
those to UK Ordnance Survey grid refs.
> If it is just a recorder, I suggest you take a look at the position
> recorders used by glider pilots such as the EW Model D (these are now
> obsolete, so should be cheap on eBay), EW Microrecorder or LXnav's Nano.
> These weigh well under 100g and typically run for 12-24 hours on internal
> batteries. All (except the model D) accept external power for longer
> operating time and all have recording capacities of well over 5 days.
>> I suspect the battery life requirement makes this the wrong platform.
>> If so, are there any other alternatives?
>>
> What do you want to track? What are your weatherproofing and temperature
> insulation requirements?
> Would something built round a PICAXE chip do the job? That would
> certainly be a lot lighter and (probably) use quite a bit less power.
There are commercially available pet trackers which come close, but
most seem to be US based and I'm not sure whether those would work
with the UK phone network. The one UK model I've found has a lot too
many features, two-way voice call for instance, and puts the cost over
100 pounds just for the hardware.
I'm looking at this for locating Duke of Edinburgh's award expedition
groups. They need to carry it, hence the weight limit, and the Gold
expedition runs for 4 days, hence the battery life limit. (It would be
possible to exchange batteries each night if that proves essential.)
The rate of travel is around 3 to 4 km per hour, so a position every
30 minutes is adequate. We would be in areas of very poor mobile phone
signal, so a text message has a chance of getting through while a
voice call fails. There isn't enough coverage for data, so anything
requiring an Internet connection won't work.
The whole thing needs to be fairly rugged, and moderately waterproof.
It can be in a sealed plastic bag, and doesn't need to be accessed
during the expedition.
Extra features which shouldn't add much to the complexity or power use
could be a panic button, which sends an immediate update together with
the word "emergency" for instance, and the ability to send to a list
of maybe 3 phones. That would both allow for increased chance of
receiving the message if the phones were on different networks or in
different locations, and allow multiple supervisors to track all the
groups.
--
Alan Adams, from Northamptonshire
alan@adamshome.org.uk
http://www.nckc.org.uk/
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Tracker Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2015-10-12 10:20 +0100
Re: Tracker Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-12 08:12 -0400
Re: Tracker Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-10-12 16:38 +0000
Re: Tracker Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-10-12 12:18 +0000
Re: Tracker Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2015-10-12 13:50 +0100
Re: Tracker ray carter <ray@zianet.com> - 2015-10-12 14:10 +0000
Re: Tracker Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-10-12 17:23 +0000
Re: Tracker Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2015-10-12 18:41 +0100
Re: Tracker Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-10-12 19:15 +0000
Re: Tracker Alan Adams <alan@adamshome.org.uk> - 2015-10-12 21:02 +0100
Re: Tracker mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-10-12 21:46 +0100
Re: Tracker Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-10-12 20:12 -0400
Re: Tracker dave <dave@cyw.uklinux.net> - 2015-10-13 09:59 +0100
Re: Tracker mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-10-13 19:26 +0100
Re: Tracker The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-10-12 19:24 +0100
Re: Tracker franssoa <franssoa@email.invalid> - 2015-10-13 14:55 +0200
csiph-web