Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #543914
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-08 15:46 -0800 |
| References | (7 earlier) <0e7b8145-7f2e-4167-9a41-b42ab8a2f64a@googlegroups.com> <61576b54-3c4f-4470-b3be-252a0efce8c1@googlegroups.com> <3351a88a-4843-484a-8afa-8274b49e3298@googlegroups.com> <a347869e-d4a1-41ad-a3e8-d01a734c806f@googlegroups.com> <7dfd5b8f-9d44-470f-b943-753dc020847e@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <43b75376-da2e-4ece-9c86-a33ff0b9cfc7@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" |
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, dobri karagorgov wrote:
> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 3:28:46 PM UTC+1, Mahipal wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 5:28:04 PM UTC-5, dobri karagorgov wrote:
> > > On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 11:25:07 PM UTC+1, Mahipal wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 2:43:53 PM UTC-5, dobri karagorgov wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 8:35:23 PM UTC+1, Kym Horsell wrote:
> > > > > > dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 8:20:03 PM UTC+1, Kym Horsell wrote:
> > > > > > >> dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> ...
> > > > > > >> >> yes they jumped to wrong conclusion but never exhausted all the approaches
> > > > > > >> and possibilities for solution. you've checked the doc right, you see that
> > > > > > >> concrete numbers favor me ??? concrete numbers agree with my
> > > > > > >> solutions with absolute 100% accuracy ???
> > > > > > >> > sorted out and refined the doc... latest version at: https://docs.google.com
> > > > > > >> I think I can wait until it can solve x^5-x+1 correctly and not
> > > > > > >> the not 100% correct x^5-x+1 = 0.000202425 +/- 0.00021254 i.
> > > > > > >> Maybe you jumped to the wrong conclusion.
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Newsflash: Steve "Hellboy" Godard finds CO2 should only
> > > > > > >> cause 2.5% of the observed global warming.
> > > > > > >> If you want to continue to believe that kind of tripe, please
> > > > > > >> avert your eyes now.
> > > > > > >> <http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/mean:60/from:1960/normalise/plot/
> > > > > > >> gistemp/mean:60/from:1960/normalise>
> > > > > > >> (Mauna Loa CO2 ppmv from c1958 vs NASA's LOTI avg global temp index).
> > > > > > > try me again {{t -> 1/12 (9 - I Sqrt[15])}, {t -> 1/12 (9 + I Sqrt[15])}}
> > > > > > is solution for t^5 - t + 1 = 0. i told you i was evaluating the binary
> > > > > > coefficient wrongfully as 2!/1!/1!.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think you jumped to another even more wrong conclusion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > t ~= 0.75 -0.322749 i
> > > > > > t^5 - t + 1 ~= 0.0885417 -0.00224131 i
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > During the late 1940s, Adamski wrote a novel, entitled Pioneers of
> > > > > > Space, about an imaginary trip to the moon, Venus and Mars. He listed
> > > > > > the book with the Library of Congress for copyright purposes as a work
> > > > > > of fiction. In 1953, Adamski co-authored Flying Saucers Have Landed
> > > > > > (New York: The British Book Centre) with British author Desmond
> > > > > > Leslie. The book, which was highly successful, tells of Adamski's
> > > > > > first alleged contact with SPACE PEOPLE. According to Adamski's and
> > > > > > Leslie's account, on November 20, 1952, Adamski went into the desert
> > > > > > accom~am'ed by anthropologist George Hunt Wifliamson, his wife Betty
> > > > > > Williamson, also an anthropologist and chemist, Mr. and Mrs. Al
> > > > > > Bailey, Lucy McGinnis and Alice K. Wells. After spotting a
> > > > > > CIGAR-SHAPED UFO, the others waited by the car while Adamski went into
> > > > > > a small canyon. There he purportedly met with a Venusian with whom he
> > > > > > communicated telepathically and by means of sign language. The
> > > > > > Venusian told Adamski he had come to Earth to stop atomic testing
> > > > > > because the radiation from fallout was dangerous to the other planets
> > > > > > in the solar system. After the spacecraft had left, Adamski noticed
> > > > > > that the Venusian had left deep footprints in the sand. Within the
> > > > > > outline of the footprints were strange hieroglyphics. The group
> > > > > > happened to have brought along some plaster of Paris with which George
> > > > > > Hunt Williamson was able to make a cast of the footprint.
> > > > > > -- <http://www.galeon.com/ignaciodarnaude/bibliografia_paracientifica/
> > > > > > Encyclopedia%20UFO%20M.Sachs.html>
> > > >
> > > > In Reality, copyright matters not. Ask any plagiarist.
> >
> > <trim>
> >
> > > i do have juries to judge me the judgment from which matters as
> > >final word, i just gave you the chance to be among the first such
> >
> > Be real, judges and juries are as reliable as politicians on Mondays.
> >
> > Most of all, your posting history is sparse. Were you born yesterday?
> >
> > Also, please don't post just another useless polynomial. Physics NG here.
> >
> > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Imagine The(y)TheThem killed John Lennon.”
>
> Ha, ha, ha... here is the simplest way to solution:\>
The solution which solves nothing, and worse than that, you typed none
of it. I got simple SW scripts that will generate random nonsense
until eternity freezes over. Shall I post one for your eyes only?
> Solve[{a4 == Random[Complex, {-10 - 10 I, +10 + 10 I}],
> a3 == Random[Complex, {-10 - 10 I, +10 + 10 I}],
> a2 == Random[Complex, {-10 - 10 I, +10 + 10 I}],
> a1 == Random[Complex, {-10 - 10 I, +10 + 10 I}],
> a0 == Random[Complex, {-10 - 10 I, +10 + 10 I}]}, {a4, a3, a2, a1,
> a0}][[1]]
>
> {a4 -> -8.30298 - 4.72983 I, a3 -> 4.01453 + 6.13921 I,
> a2 -> 2.03686 + 5.01094 I, a1 -> 7.83078 + 8.28426 I,
> a0 -> 1.43986 + 3.38058 I}
>
> In[9]:= Solve[m/x == n x, x]
>
> Out[9]= {{x -> -(Sqrt[m]/Sqrt[n])}, {x -> Sqrt[m]/Sqrt[n]}}
>
> In[10]:= ReplaceAll[{m/x, n x}, {x -> Sqrt[m]/Sqrt[n]}]
>
> Out[10]= {Sqrt[m] Sqrt[n], Sqrt[m] Sqrt[n]}
>
> In[14]:= ReplaceAll[t^(5/x) == (-(-t + 1))^(1 x), Solve[5/x == 1 x, x][[2]]]
>
> Out[14]= t^Sqrt[5] == (-1 + t)^Sqrt[5]
>
> In[15]:= Collect[t^Sqrt[5] ==
> ReplaceAll[
> Sum[(n! a^(n - k) b^k)/(k! (n - k)!), {k, 0, n, Sqrt[5]/4}], {n -> Sqrt[5],
> a -> t, b -> -1}], t]
>
> Out[15]= t^Sqrt[5] == (-1)^Sqrt[5] + t^Sqrt[5] + (
> I^Sqrt[5] t^(Sqrt[5]/2) Sqrt[5]!)/((Sqrt[5]/2)!)^2 + ((-1)^((3 Sqrt[5])/4)
> t^(Sqrt[5]/4) Sqrt[5]!)/((Sqrt[5]/4)! ((3 Sqrt[5])/4)!) + ((-1)^(Sqrt[5]/
> 4) t^((3 Sqrt[5])/4) Sqrt[5]!)/((Sqrt[5]/4)! ((3 Sqrt[5])/4)!)
>
> In[26]:= N[ReplaceAll[
> Solve[0 == (-1)^Sqrt[5] + (
> I^Sqrt[5] x^2 Sqrt[5]!)/((Sqrt[5]/2)!)^2 + ((-1)^((3 Sqrt[5])/4)
> x Sqrt[5]!)/((Sqrt[5]/4)! ((3 Sqrt[5])/4)!) + ((-1)^(Sqrt[5]/4)
> x^3 Sqrt[5]!)/((Sqrt[5]/4)! ((3 Sqrt[5])/4)!), x],
> Solve[t^(Sqrt[5]/4) == x, x][[1]]]]
>
> In[27]:= Solve[(t^0.5590169943749475` - (0.14739824834890441` -
> 0.7858662474105508` I)) (t^0.5590169943749475` - (-0.7417477424309309` \
> - 0.34817990743496763` I)) (t^0.5590169943749475` - (0.8175046019208685` -
> 0.05572420641882503` I)) == 0, t]
>
> During evaluation of In[27]:= Solve::ifun: Inverse functions are
>being used by Solve, so some solutions may not be found; use Reduce
>for complete solution information. >>
No surprise that.
> Out[27]= {{t -> -0.528104 - 0.412692 I}, {t -> 0.695075 - 0.0850437 I}}
>
> In[28]:= N[ReplaceAll[
> t^5 - t + 1, {{t -> -0.5281042397091176` - 0.4126924553723451` I}, {t ->
> 0.6950751703712601` - 0.08504374480435843` I}}]]
>
> Out[28]= {1.66128 + 0.43625 I, 0.44306 - 0.0112411 I}
Thank you Seema! IPMM... FOX(y) News... Jimi Hendrix tune...
How hot and sexy do you have to be, to be a Talking Head?! These days.
To be more meaningful in a single sentence!
To leap tall buildings without falling to the ground!
It's a bird, it's a plane, no... it's a Macy's helium balloon.
No, no, NO... it's a Amazonian SuperDrone delivering your GEICO.
Thank you Seema==Limit! IPMM... FOX(y) Lady... Some Viagra Required.
What the hell is this lousy pretense of limiting our surveilled govern
Mental selves to just accessing meta data for?! I must be nuts...
We tag and track the tigers and fish, but we throw away the data?!
Say what What WHAT...?! I must be the nuts in a Three Stooges Sitcom!
-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल: Imagine why The(y)TheThem killed John Lennon.”
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 04:04 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 12:17 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 05:12 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 13:50 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 06:17 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 06:22 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 18:46 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 10:54 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 10:56 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" Robin Chapman <R.J.Chapman@ex.ac.uk> - 2016-01-08 13:32 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-09 04:16 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 06:40 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 06:45 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 07:01 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 07:45 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 19:14 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 06:10 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 19:19 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 11:22 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 11:28 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 19:35 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 11:43 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 11:45 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 19:53 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:16 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:17 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:36 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 20:47 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 13:33 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 13:47 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 21:58 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:08 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 21:56 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:07 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 22:14 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:25 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-07 22:42 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" Robin Chapman <R.J.Chapman@ex.ac.uk> - 2016-01-08 13:31 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-09 04:21 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:25 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:28 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 06:28 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 11:00 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 11:49 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 12:16 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 12:52 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 14:16 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 15:46 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-08 02:57 +0000
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 05:28 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 06:15 -0800
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-09 15:31 +1100
Re: great news ladies "solution to quintic and all polynomials" NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 02:07 -0800
csiph-web