Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #274571
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <mrv3ht$97c$1@dont-email.me> <07q6uad6jbpbdkpduu2aek3r17pbmp1fon@4ax.com> <mrvv35$tv4$1@dont-email.me> <2i78uat7ibfse9nb2bj947p2gk0man8jjn@4ax.com> <Nq2dnbnrT_4r2HnInZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <40fc5a76824c76c430686bb2809d4802@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-31 16:27 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid delusional woman-stalking failed truck driver), in <news:Nq2dnbnrT_4r2HnInZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:2i78uat7ibfse9nb2bj947p2gk0man8jjn@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:13:41 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 10:23:35 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 09:21:16 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:17:25 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been ko0k-ing this same old schick >>>>>>>>>> since at least Dec 2013. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nothing new, old fart re-farting same fart, over and over, stuck >>>>>>>>>> in a DO loop. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/2014-01/0000.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> this index goes back to 2003 ! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/ >>>>>>>>> It<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >>>>>>>> So long as mentally unbalanced people exist, the Troofer >>>>>>>> religion will continue. >>>>>>>>> N<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >>>>>>>> I await your valid, verifiable cite that billions are being >>>>>>>> spent on such an endeavor. If your claim is a lie or the result of >>>>>>>> mental health issues, no valid, verifiable cite will be offered. >>>>>>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >>>>>> Your failure to provide valid, verifiable evidence, and default >>>>>> admission that you lied due to mental heal issues is noted and >>>>>> accepted. >>>>> Tha<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >>>> That you've again been reduced to lying is very telling. >>>>> S<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >>>> I'm sure others will, just as I did. And I'm sure 99.9% will see >>>> it for the mentally unstable delusion that it is. >>> O<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >> Few are as intellectually challenged as you. As such, few will >> buy into the bunk you present. >>> Ths<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >> When a video lies about the speed of the collapse of the towers, >> that should be a clue that the video isn't reliable. > You idiot the speed that the Twin Towers fell at was probably 100% of > freefa<SMACKAKOOK!> Liar: <http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf> ===================================================== Previous analysis of progressive collapse showed that gravity alone suffices to explain the overall collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers. However, it remains to be checked whether the recent allegations of controlled demolition have any scientific merit. The present analysis proves that they do not. The video record available for the first few seconds of collapse is shown to agree with the motion history calculated from the differential equation of progressive collapse but, despite uncertain values of some parameters, it is totally out of range of the free fall hypothesis, on which these allegations rest. It is shown that the observed size range (0.01 mm—0.1 mm) of the dust particles of pulverized concrete is consistent with the theory of comminution caused by impact, and that less than 10% of the total gravitational energy, converted to kinetic energy, sufficed to produce this dust (whereas more than 150 tons of TNT per tower would have to be installed, into many small holes drilled into concrete, to produce the same pulverization). The air ejected from the building by gravitational collapse must have attained, near the ground, the speed of almost 500 mph (or 223 m/s, or 803 km/h) on the average, and fluctuations must have reached the speed of sound. This explains the loud booms and wide spreading of pulverized concrete and other fragments, and shows that the lower margin of the dust cloud could not have coincided with the crushing front. The resisting upward forces due to pulverization and to ejection of air, dust and solid fragments, neglected in previous studies, are found to be indeed negligible during the first few seconds of collapse but not insignificant near the end of crush-down. The calculated crush-down duration is found to match a logical interpretation of seismic record, while the free fall duration grossly disagrees with this record. ===================================================== Take your meds, Roger Wittekind. LOL > And the top 100 floors of the Twin Towers never even made it > to the gro<SMACKAKOOK!> Liar: You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? > O<SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. LOL > As for the speed that WTC7 fell at. Even NIST admits that it fell at 100% > of freefall for the first 100 feet. For the first 100 feet, and it fell starting at the junction in the outer truss frame at the top-most mechanical room floor below the fire, where the truss frame was all joined together on one floor with only two 5/8" bolts per truss section (on all other floors the truss frame joins were staggered to increase strength)... meaning both the central column and truss frame metal were not only thinner up there (the truss frame metal was as thin as 1/4" thick) and used lower-grade steel, but it was also heat-soaked to the point of losing its ability to resist deformation. But your admission that the towers didn't fall at freefall speed for ~90% of their uncontrolled collapse is noted. Moron. LOL > So what are you really bitching about? The fact that you're spewing unsubstantiated delusional blather, Roger Wittekind. Moron. >>> Ot<SMACKAKOOK!> Retard. LOL >> Suddenly claims make more sense. You are unable to distinguish >> between reality and fiction. In your mind, the claims of Troofers are >> 100% reality, because you can't tell the difference. > And yet it is you who is still fooled by the CG<SMACKAKOOK!> No CGIs, no proof from you, only more retarded blather from your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional broken brain, Roger Wittekind. LOL Moron. LOL > And not only does the following video show why a wing disap<SMACKAKOOK!> Utter and complete bullshit: The wing disappeared? If that's the case, it would have disappeared on all the personal videos, too, right? But it didn't, did it. No, it certainly did not: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbWD_dGBIm8> Whoopsie... the wing *did* disappear... behind a cloud of smoke. Which the low-resolution camera wasn't able to differentiate from the open sky, and thus the camera's firmware "lossied" out that part of the wing... it's a digital camera artifact, nothing more. A higher-resolution video from nearly the same angle (also in that video above) *was* able to differentiate between the smoke, the wing and the sky, and the wing is clearly visible throughout. And that's from another 9/11 "inside job" kook... even those broken-brained kooks are laughing at how insane you are. Moron. LOL > Steve Grage & James Ea<SMACKAKOOK!> You mean that stupidity-filled "movie" (read: rant) that offered no proof whatsoever? You're devolving into utter insanity if you believe that anti-semitic schlock. I mean, really... the fireproofing project at the WTC towers was actually a scheme to plant a plane-shaped nanothermite outline on the towers... and the white smoke was indicative of the aluminum oxide in the claimed nanothermite? It wasn't the aluminum facade burning? What does aluminum do in a fire, Ko0k? Why, its passivation layer of aluminum oxide burns off, does it not? They used napalm in the tower? It wasn't the jet fuel exploding on impact? Moron. LOL Do you really believe this insane shit, Roger Wittekind? LOL You're mental, Roger Wittekind. Seek immediate professional psychiatric help, and ask for mega-doses of anti-psychotic meds. Moron. LOL > A<SMACKAKOOK!> Schizophrenic paranoid-delusional kook. LOL > Rocky Moron. LOL -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator" that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been lying this same schick since at least Dec 2013 gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:25 -0500
9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 10:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 18:13 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 07:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:27 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Kent is given the no planes video) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 08:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 07:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (kent tries to sidetrack) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (kent tries to sidetrack) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 13:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:14 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 23:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 08:06 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 07:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:24 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 09:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 11:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 10:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 11:24 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 13:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 16:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 06:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 09:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 11:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:37 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:14 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 13:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-31 14:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 11:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-01 23:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 10:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-02 16:00 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 10:14 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:24 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 13:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 14:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 19:11 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 10:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 12:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 07:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-07 11:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:36 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 20:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 10:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 12:28 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 09:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 10:00 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 07:36 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 09:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 12:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-07 11:08 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 10:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 12:06 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-01 23:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-03 21:47 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 07:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-04 22:12 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 08:50 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 06:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:11 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 08:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 10:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 10:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-08 11:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-08 11:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:14 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (K missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-04 11:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-05 09:17 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 09:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 08:58 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 23:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:27 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 05:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:14 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:05 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 13:45 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-08 12:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (K is full of it) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Roger is once again reduced to lying, as I prove) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (FK is faced with more ?s) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 18:00 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Roger FEARS offering honest answers to questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Kid is lying sack of shit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 09:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Kid is lying sack of shit) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 13:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 13:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:18 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:06 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 3 ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 3 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:36 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 13:01 +0100
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 07:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 15:55 +0100
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 10:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 16:49 +0100
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 10:51 -0500
Re: Rocky nuts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 16:10 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 20:38 +0100
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 20:40 +0100
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:44 -0500
Re: Rocky still nuts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:48 +0000
Re: Rocky still nuts Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:49 -0400
Re: Rocky still nuts gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 10:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 08:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 15:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:25 -0500
Re: Rocky still raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:50 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Roger has to post edit to avoid the truth. Again) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-30 10:08 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 10:43 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 10:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 13:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 13:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-30 12:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:49 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 17:22 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 18:01 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:17 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:05 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:40 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:47 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 14:08 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-31 14:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 11:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-01 23:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 11:26 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-02 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 05:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-03 10:59 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-05 09:21 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 09:05 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 06:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:30 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:14 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 07:46 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 09:07 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:31 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 05:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 15:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 15:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:22 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:16 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. ?s for hvac "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. ?s for hvac HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 10:20 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof hvac is crazy "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof hvac is crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:41 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof jimp is a cartoon freak "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 12:56 -0500
Re: Rocky still batshit crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:11 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof jimp is a cartoon freak "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:32 -0500
Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:35 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. K caught in a big lie "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. ?s for hvac jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:40 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 10:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 09:24 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 23:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:34 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:24 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 22:45 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BKD admits why he was so easily fooled "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:50 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:45 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:35 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 05:50 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-08 09:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 21:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-06 18:41 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 06:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-05 17:33 -0700
gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:25 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-30 23:58 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:59 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:26 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:37 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:32 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 15:41 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 23:51 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 17:10 -0500
csiph-web