Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #687381

Moroney says-- no manners here-- Charlie Baker, Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin can't do percentages//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

Show all headers | View raw

On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 3:24:16 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
Re: _Burse calls 25 years crazy-- Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts, Giovanni Felder of ETH, no picture diagram of Calculus proof// still believing proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV
>What about your own manners?

Michael Moroney writes: 
1:35 AM (37 minutes ago) 
> posting for what? 25 years now, and 
>not a single post of any serious science. All his posts are attacks on 
>other posters or babbling nonsense. 


percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945 


On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

AP writes: 
Does the state of Massachusetts ever have education reviews. For here is a stalker of Moroney for 25 years-- obsessive stalker of AP, and only AP, says he is a electrical engineer yet never admits to mistakes that 938 is not 12% short of 945, but only .7% short, less than 1% short. So what kind of engineer is it from Barry Shein's std.com, that cannot even do a percentage correctly and never admits to mistakes, only stalks and harasses other people who do know math and science. 

Why is std.com so hateful of the tv program THIS OLD HOUSE, when I have learned so much from that show. 

Why is std.com such a antiscience ISP, with Moroney hating percentage problem, hating geothermal-- is std.com the worst isp for science in Boston, or is Barry Shein topped by someone else? 


President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) 

MIT physics dept 
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt*, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young 

   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston? 
And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in Real Electron=105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, and .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole, your students deserve better. 

Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole 

President Larry Summers 

Harvard Physics dept 
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai * 
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin*, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau 
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine 
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii 
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul 
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson 
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin 


Can someone in the Boston area make sure this numbskull is never a science teacher in Boston-- and the damage he can do to a classroom 

Mike Moroney, science failure-- on geothermal 


(1) 
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 12:15:22 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> There are some places here that use "geothermal" for heating and cooling 
> but even these are solar power in disguise.  They pump water from wells 
> from where the temperature is the average over many years and extract heat 
> from it (in the winter) and dump heat into it (in the summer) and pump the 
> water back into the ground.  The water is about 55F out of the ground. 



(2) 
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:31:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:   

> 
> >Just as a point of order, what you described is not geothermal. What 
> >you've just described is thermal balancing with water, using water 
> >cooler than air from the water table to cool a building in the summer, 
> >and using water warmer than air from the water table to warm a building 
> >in the winter. 
> 
> In other words, glorified solar energy.  Solar energy stored and averaged 
> out over many, many years. 
> 

(3) 
On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 8:44:12 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they 
> use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any 
> better. 
> 
> Just answer one question, if you can.  If it's really geothermal, why 
> is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real 
> geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees? 


(4) 
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> > 
> > Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and 
> > winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending 
> > on how deep they go. 
> > 
> > Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it 
> > is much better than simply using that energy to make heat. 
> 

(5) 
On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 12:30:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> It's amusing how he can't handle that at all. Just like he can't 
> handle the concept of permafrost when he goes off on geothermal 
> energy.  All he can do is attack. 

(6) 


On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 12:21:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> geothermal heat energy is 99% from the sun where he was (unsure where, 
> Mass. I think) 
> 
> Now tell us where Permafrost comes from. 
> 
> p.p.s. I was searching because I am actually looking into getting 
> geothermal heat. Fossil solar energy is a great resource! 


Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall 

12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 
by Archimedes Plutonium 

Proofs that the Real Electron=muon and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall 
> 
PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon 

1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV 
Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy. 

AP 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

30-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// we take the S orbital as a radius & circumference / P orbital of 6 as the 6 sides of cube to do Chemistry bonding Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 09:28 -0700
  30-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// we take the S orbital as a radius & circumference / P orbital of 6 as the 6 sides of cube to do Chemistry bonding Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 11:42 -0700
    Re: 30-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// term "stealing" replaced by "bond" or "bonding" Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 19:35 -0700
      31-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// fun to see how "bond" is defined in Old Chemistry, versus New Chemistry Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 22:09 -0700
        31-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// fun to see how "bond" is defined in Old Chemistry, versus New Chemistry Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 00:52 -0700
          31-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// fun to see how "bond" is defined in Old Chemistry, versus New Chemistry Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 01:12 -0700
            31-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// fun to see how "bond" is defined in Old Chemistry, versus New Chemistry Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 01:39 -0700
              32-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// Centripetal force versus Centrifugal--orbital versus pseudoorbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:00 -0700
                33-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// since Universe is one big atom of 231Pu, is it a astronomy Coil with thrusting bar magnet? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:37 -0700
                Re: 32-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// at maximum, 6 valence muons surrounding a center Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:26 -0700
                Re: 32-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// at maximum, 6 valence muons surrounding a center Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 18:00 -0700
                34-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// definition of "Bond" in chemistry; Bond in New Chemistry is a stealing not sharing of valence muons Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 22:08 -0700
                35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism will reveal where the extra valence muons go into a pseudo-orbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 22:50 -0700
                35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism will reveal where the extra valence muons go into a pseudo-orbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 00:08 -0700
                35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism will reveal where the extra valence muons go into a pseudo-orbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 00:12 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism will reveal where the extra valence muons go into a pseudo-orbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 09:34 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism will reveal where the extra valence muons go into a pseudo-orbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 09:45 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism will reveal where the extra valence muons go into a pseudo-orbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 10:40 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism will reveal where the extra valence muons go into a pseudo-orbital Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 10:43 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// diamagnetism and paramagnetism entire field started over Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 11:01 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// rewriting the theory of diamagnetism and paramagnetism Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:58 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// is charge, geometrically a hook? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0700
                Re: 35-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// is charge, geometrically a hook? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0700
                36-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// Proofs that Chemistry is more about protons than about electrons Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 07:32 -0700
                37-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// redoing over the Rutherford foil experiments and proving him, somewhat wrong Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:23 -0700
                37-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// astronomy follows the theory of atoms as torus, for the Ring in third layer Perseus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 12:37 -0700
                Re: _Burse calls 25 years crazy-- Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts, Giovanni Felder of ETH, no picture diagram of Calculus proof// still believing proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-27 20:24 +0000
                Moroney says-- no manners here--  Charlie Baker, Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin can't do percentages//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:38 -0700
                Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-27 20:55 +0000
                Re: 37-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// astronomy follows the theory of atoms as torus, for the Ring in third layer Perseus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:45 -0700
                Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-25 18:48 +0000

csiph-web