Groups > comp.lang.c > #20824

Re: A question for this group...

Message-ID	<3lqa89-n19.ln1@wilbur.25thandClement.com> (permalink)
From	William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com>
Subject	Re: A question for this group...
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
References	<jou4fd$5uh$1@news.xmission.com>
Date	2012-05-15 13:24 -0700

Show all headers | View raw

Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:
> If somebody asks:
>
>         Why does it hurt when I stick my finger in a light socket?
>
> Is it universally true that the only possible answer is:
>
>         Don't stick your fingers in light sockets.
>
> Is it really true that an explanation of how electricity works and how
> your body is a conductor (and, in particular, how the real issue is how
> well grounded your body is) is never appropriate?
>
> This seems to be the attitude of this group - see in particular the recent
> "Program Output" thread.

Your light socket analogy is a perfect example. Anyone who has grown up in
an electrified civilization knows from an extremely early age that
electricity can be dangerous, and that a light socket is associated with
electricity . With this background knowledge, they would never ask "why does
it hurt when I do X" unless they were being lazy or naive. If he weren't
lazy or naive, he would have made the association with electricity and
reformed the question appropriately.

A common response to both laziness and naivety is sarcasm. It signals to the
person that they need to rethink their question in a very fundamental way;
that perhaps they're in deeper water than they think.

I went through the thread you mentioned (sans Google Groups posts). I think
the responses were just fine. They rightfully didn't talk down to the OP.
The responses were accurate, and they signaled to the OP that his analytical
investment in the issue was poor. If he can't interpret that signal, then
he's not prepared to learn anything.

Thread

A question for this group... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-05-15 17:41 +0000
  Re: A question for this group... "Chine Bleu, Russie Blanche, et Khmer Rouge" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-15 10:44 -0700
    Re: A question for this group... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-15 14:06 -0400
  Re: A question for this group... William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-05-15 13:24 -0700
    Re: A question for this group... Quentin Pope <qp19433@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2012-05-15 20:56 +0000
      Re: A question for this group... nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-16 03:41 -0700
  Re: A question for this group... Old Wolf <oldwolf@inspire.net.nz> - 2012-05-16 02:31 -0700
  Re: A question for this group... nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-16 03:53 -0700
    Re: A question for this group... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-05-16 14:08 +0000
      Re: A question for this group... Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-16 14:49 +0000
        Re: A question for this group... Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-16 14:59 +0000
      Re: A question for this group... Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-05-16 16:05 +0000
      Re: A question for this group... Old Wolf <oldwolf@inspire.net.nz> - 2012-05-16 14:29 -0700
    Re: A question for this group... Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-05-16 18:18 -0500
  Re: A question for this group... Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-06-23 23:22 -0500
  Re: A question for this group... Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-25 02:41 -0700
    Re: A question for this group... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-06-25 16:29 +0000
      Re: A question for this group... nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-26 08:27 -0700
        Re: A question for this group... gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2012-06-27 09:05 +0000
          Re: A question for this group... nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-27 03:57 -0700
        Re: A question for this group... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-06-27 13:49 +0000
          Re: A question for this group... "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-06-28 09:19 +0200
            Re: A question for this group... nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-06-28 01:59 -0700
              Re: A question for this group... Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-28 04:18 -0700
                Re: A question for this group... Heikki Kallasjoki <fis+usenet@zem.fi> - 2012-06-28 12:14 +0000
                Re: A question for this group... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-28 08:28 -0400
                Re: A question for this group... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-28 08:33 -0400
                Re: A question for this group... Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-28 13:07 -0700
                Re: A question for this group... David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2012-07-19 02:40 -0400
              Re: A question for this group... "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-06-28 18:58 +0200
                Re: A question for this group... Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-06-29 01:11 +0100
                Re: A question for this group... Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2012-07-05 00:21 -0700
                Re: A question for this group... nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-07-06 00:24 -0700
                Re: A question for this group... Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-06 17:43 -0700

csiph-web