Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Déjà vu |
| Date | 2017-01-11 13:42 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <3e1f2da7-84cd-fe88-2e55-830398ca8c74@att.net> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <9b1ba3a2-1165-4258-bb6a-2209dc91c1c8@googlegroups.com> <7372d26e-b9c4-788e-c728-b2cb4a792d20@att.net> <7845dcfc-77dd-40cd-88f9-11b4ce5763d5@googlegroups.com> <23f89e87-9ca4-e13f-a545-f14e7d802758@att.net> <97e3af17-7920-4196-bb65-340bceafc232@googlegroups.com> |
On 1/11/2017 1:26 PM, John Gabriel wrote: > On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 10:11:08 UTC-8, > Jim Burns wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 12:22 PM, John Gabriel wrote: >>> On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 09:13:39 UTC-8, >>> Jim Burns wrote: >>>> No, you don't get to ooze your way out of this >>>> by re-defining "infinity". >>>> >>> No greatest natural number is NOT equivalent to >>> "infinitely many ..." whatever the latter bullshit means. >> >> No, you don't get to ooze your way out of this >> by re-defining "infinity". >> >> If you ask _nicely_ maybe someone will explain what >> "infinitely many" means. No promise that someone will and >> certainly no commitment from me. > > You don't get to quote the father of all mathematical cranks > and call that a definition. Chuckle. No, you don't get to ooze your way out of this by re-defining "infinity". Or "definition", either. Would Euclid be impressed with your "argument" of sticking your fingers in your ears and singing "LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU"?
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 12:34 -0500
Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-09 10:08 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 17:18 -0500
Re: Déjà vu genmailus@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 14:28 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 17:55 -0500
Re: Déjà vu Me <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 17:12 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-09 20:55 -0500
Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 18:08 -0800
Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 23:08 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 10:55 -0500
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 05:13 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 09:49 -0500
Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-10 07:44 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 11:45 -0500
Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-10 09:51 -0800
Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 10:33 -0800
Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 10:35 -0800
Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 13:00 -0800
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 11:05 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 18:08 -0500
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 17:25 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 01:48 -0500
Re: Déjà vu "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 23:24 -0800
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 00:34 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 11:26 -0500
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 08:55 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 12:13 -0500
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:20 -0800
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:22 -0800
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:23 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 13:11 -0500
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 10:26 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-11 13:42 -0500
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 10:50 -0800
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 10:58 -0800
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 11:01 -0800
Re: Déjà vu John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 11:03 -0800
Re: Déjà vu bursejan@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 11:11 -0800
Re: Déjà vu WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@hs-augsburg.de> - 2017-01-10 00:03 -0800
Re: Déjà vu Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2017-01-10 10:21 -0500
csiph-web