Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #590184

Re: More Physics Heresay

Show all headers | View raw

Michael Strickland asked 17 questions

AF Preamble

AF All your questions have been answered, all mysteries resolved, all doubts, evaporated. Leave behind your learnings about quarks, your faith in uncertainty, your expectations of symmetry in many things. Open up to the new science using 8 dimensions : The Gravity Continuum and the Electricity Continuum

Negative mass - Not Antimatter (aka More Physics Heresy) 

1 What would be the implications of negative mass? 

AF A negative area is a negative mass. It is geometrically meaningful, but it is not found in the Gravity Continuum of dimensions 1,2,3,4. Symmetry does not cause negative mass. But if it is found, an unspeakable bafflement would collapse all confidence in human reason and intelligence. New branches of reality would become a fertile area for research.

2 Would it repel positive mass and attract other negative masses? 

AF No. Mass does not cause gravity. Matter causes gravity: proton and neutron Volumes cause the Volumes of space near stars to flow like water. Negative mass would not be attracted by a gravitating body since it has no positive area of square meters. A proton is 20.4 barns. Mass=Area.  negative mass-negative area. Twilight zone stuff. Unexpected and undetected.

3 If we could find or produce anti-mass, would we observe anti-gravity? 

AF No. Mass does not cause gravity. Mass is effected by gravity.

4 Are mass and charge both manifestations of the same thing? 

AF In dimensions 1,2,3,4 = x,y,z,t mass can be x*y for example

AF In dimensions 5,6,7,8 = Ex,Ey,Ez,Ht charge can be Ex(Ht)*Ey(Ht) for example

AF Charge is area in a wave function of 3 dimensions: Ex Ey Ht. The electrons sends Ht to a proton, which returns Ex Ey. That contra flow of 3D wave function has places near a charged baryon or lepton called "Charge". It is a stationary flow which can emit a photon from Ex Ht, 2 dimensions of 3.

AF No, but they have a symmetry across the Two Continua.

5 Could we model them as the real and imaginary components of a complex charge/mass (inertia?). I've tried but it doesn't seem to help much. 

AF No. The complex notation uses Two Dimensions, but charge uses 3D: Ex Ey Ht. Five dimensions can model mass and charge: x,y Ex Ey Ht. Complex imaginary part and Real part are only 2D.

6 Is mass required to contain charge? There is currently nothing with 
charge that is massless. 

AF All charged particles have mass. The mass is near the electron and proton in a tiny area adjacent to the particles. It is a fluid dynamic mass=area surrounding electrons and protons. Charge is not "Contained" inside a particle, it is outside the particle and close by in a bend in a 3D wave function membrane.

7 Is the electron/positron the mass quantum or has it been replaced by the new massive neutrinos? 

AF Mass is quantized and experiments show indistinguishability of electrons. The positron is an electron with a temporary reversal of a 3D wave function near a proton. Positrons are always found near a proton, with an electron. Charge neutrality is assured. Neutrinos do not establish a quantum of mass for a proton or electron. A neutrino has no mass=xy. A neutrino has only one dimension: Ez.

8 Could neutrinos be small couplets of positive and negative charge 
thereby rendering it the new mass quantum? 

AF No. Neutrinos are from neutrons. Neutrinos, before being released by a neutron, serve neutron internal functions to capture a positive charge dimension Ez from a proton. That capture of the charge repulsion dimension Ez allows nuclear stability. It is called iso-spin when inside a neutron, and it is called a neutrino when outside a neutron.

9 Could photons be the ultimate charge and mass quantums with a tiny amount of both? 

AF No. Photons have 2D, two dimensions Ex Ht. Photons have no momentum, no energy. A photon departs an atom, which has momentum and energy. That departure takes a time and a length (Ht Ex) and that changes the atom's energy and momentum. The photon travels to a second atom and its time and length Ht Ex, is inserted into the 3D wave function Ex Ey Ht, and that changes the energy and momentum of the second atom.

10 Has anyone done my experiment to detect charge in/on a photon yet? 

[Shine a light on a blackbody situated between two capacitor plates 
for a long time and see if the electric field measured between the 
plates (outside the block) changes. If any charge (even equal amounts 
of positive and negative charge) is deposited in/on the block, it 
should increase the dielectric constant (and epsilon) of the block, 
increasing the capacitance, and reducing the measured electric field 
(E) in response to a constant applied electric field (D).] 

AF Yes. Photons have no charge=area=ExEy, photons have speed=Ex/Ht. The photoelectric effect is your experiment. Nobel winning stuff.

And back to my favorite, 

11 WHAT IS CHARGE? I still (after decades of patiently waiting) have received no satisfactory answer from the world of physics. 

AF Charge is area of electricity continuum. It is substantial. It is paired, positive and negative. Each free charge is paired with remote opposite charges. Its area gives a "place" for magnetic torque and electrostatic attraction to attain force. That charge place is in dimensions 5678.

12 Is it just a "magic dollop" that is bestowed on some particles without any detectable change to the particles themselves other than the way they interact with other particles with the same or opposite "dollops"?

AF Yes. Magic. Reality. We can only accept the evidence which crowds out all doubt. Charge is part of a Unified Theory of Everything with 8D. Conservation of Continua and Symmetry in dimensional flows seems magic in 2016, standard in 2021. Charge is an ASPECT of the 4D electricity continuum. An aspect is a perceived fact seen from a perspective. See The Periodic Table of Units of Measure.

http://fcgravity.blogspot.com/p/first-law-of-difffusion-of-herenowium.html

13 So is charge invisible? 

AF Yes. Visible light of wavelength 4000 Angstroms is too big for a 2 Angstrom charge area.

14 Is it massless? 

AF Yes.

15 If you could crawl up close to (and inside of) an electron and a 
positron, wouldn't they have to "look different" to "be different? I 
say they must. 

AF Yes. A positron has its wave function reversed, relative to its parental protons and electrons in an atom.

16 How much of the electron's mass is required to contain its negative charge? 

AF "required" is not an appropriate word here. The negative charge is by a particle, an electron. The electrons mass does not contain a charge. The charge is outside the electron.

An electron has 3 times the charge of a down quark yet it is 
at least 3 times lighter. 

AF Quarks were a mistake. Do not waste your days studying quarks.

17 Where does it squeeze all that extra 2/3 negative charge in or conversely, how does the down quark dilute its 1/3 negative charge over 3 times the mass as an electron. 

AF The quark boondoggle started in a spray of sparks in a collider. The sparks were misinterpreted. Electrons do not have quarks. Protons do not have quarks. New science is available on that subject. Old science is drummed into the heads of PhD candidates who bow down to authority to get the degree approved by establishment chair warmers. 

Thank you for playing. Alan Folmsbee, Maui, USA

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More Physics Heresay Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-07-21 03:05 -0400
  Re: More Physics Heresay Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 02:15 -0700
  Re: More Physics Heresay Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-21 10:22 -0500
  Re: More Physics Heresay Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-24 18:18 +0200
    e.e hearsay, here said ... that sylli poet? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:59 -0700
      Re: e.e hearsay, here said ... that sylli poet? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-26 07:39 +0200
    Re: More Physics Heresay "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 01:08 -0700
      Proton mass (was: More Physics Heresay) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-26 15:35 +0200
        Re: Proton mass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-26 17:05 +0200
          Re: Proton mass john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 08:09 -0700
    Negative mass (was: More Physics Heresay) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-31 09:05 +0200
  Re: More Physics Heresay Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-26 13:03 +1000
  Re: More Physics Heresay Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 12:43 -0400
    Re: More Physics Heresay Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-26 20:31 +0200
      Re: More Physics Heresay noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 11:57 -0700
    Re: More Physics Heresay Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-31 09:07 +0200
      Re: More Physics Heresay ben6993 <ben6993@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-01 00:19 -0700
  Re: More Physics Heresay ben6993 <ben6993@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-26 15:10 -0700
    more sloganeers noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 12:19 -0700
      Re: more sloganeers noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:26 -0700

csiph-web