Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #20405
| Message-ID | <3770192.NsdZWxn5O3@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2013-06-23 20:01 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Identifying a regex |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (2 earlier) <kpmu20$5q5$1@news.albasani.net> <f623b8ea-0bf3-429d-b04b-903627edfa1e@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com> <2138020.VnviE1jULI@PointedEars.de> <kpq833$o40$1@news.albasani.net> <4497153.IWULeidUyA@PointedEars.de> |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > I am not convinced that constructor.name is interoperable in the first > place. The ECMAScript Support Matrix, Version 2, contains a testcase for > Function.prototype.name that has been recently run (by someone else – > thank you) to fail in JavaScript 1.8.6 and JScript 10.0.16578. But that > might be due to “name” being a property of Function instances only in > those implementations. I shall modify that testcase accordingly. > > <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix/?filter=Function.prototype.name#features-table> [x] done > That said, neither Function.prototype.name nor functionInstance.name are > specified in the ECMAScript Language Specification, 5.1 Edition, §15.3, so > they are very likely not interoperable. […] Looking forward to test results to find out. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-17 01:47 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-06-16 19:30 -0700
Re: Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-17 14:05 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-06-17 16:16 -0700
Re: Identifying a regex Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-18 02:13 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-18 20:14 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-18 21:39 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-18 23:58 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 22:05 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-06-25 16:59 -0700
Re: Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 23:47 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-23 20:01 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-06-18 00:40 -0700
Re: Identifying a regex Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-18 10:39 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-06-18 19:32 -0700
Re: Identifying a regex Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-19 14:05 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-06-19 20:24 -0700
Re: Identifying a regex Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-06-20 12:27 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-06-20 18:08 -0700
Re: Identifying a regex JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2013-06-17 13:58 +0700
Re: Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-17 14:11 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2013-06-18 12:46 +0700
Re: Identifying a regex Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-06-18 20:17 +0200
Re: Identifying a regex Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2013-06-18 21:14 +0200
csiph-web