Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #273749
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <58f98b41-7765-4085-81ec-4dc369f01a30@googlegroups.com> <dpkjta597l4soscmq6jr37j7dhe1h81idp@4ax.com> <YdmdnYVLaf_WYkTInZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> <hv0ntalubvosjg5tgk2j3ieeerosnre3co@4ax.com> <nbOdnSRyS6pyEEbInZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Subject | Re: Topaz terrorist |
| Message-ID | <36a9b5a4270fcf28c485809ad360bafe@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:nbOdnSRyS6pyEEbInZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:hv0ntalubvosjg5tgk2j3ieeerosnre3co@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 12:15:27 -0500, Rocky >> (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) >> <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> Breaker. >>> >>> There is one thing missing from the 9/11 Commission and that is the motive >>> for the alleged hijackers. So without a motive why the heck would living >>> suicide pilots help in the Great 9/11 Hoax? Liar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motives_for_the_September_11_attacks "In Osama Bin Laden's November 2002 "Letter to America",[5][6] he explicitly stated that al-Qaeda's motives for their attacks include: Western support for attacking Muslims in Somalia, supporting Russian atrocities against Muslims in Chechnya, supporting the Indian oppression against Muslims in Kashmir, the Jewish aggression against Muslims in Lebanon, the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia,[6][7][8] US support of Israel,[9][10] and sanctions against Iraq.[11]" [8] "Tenth Public Hearing, Testimony of Louis Freeh". 9/11 Commission. April 13, 2004. <http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf> Starting on p.64 But then, you've never actually read the 9/11 Commission report, have you, Mike? Now that you've been exposed as a liar, what will you do, Mike? LOL Kook. LOL >> It's clear that no real planes actually hit the towers: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQBlv7sZGVE It is clear you're unable to deal with the reality that planes hit the towers, destroyed part of the outer truss frame, weakened the central column by fire, melted the viscoelastic dampers holding the truss frame and floor spars together, which allowed the floor to droop and buckle the weakened central column, which made successively lower sections of truss frame bow out and rip away from their viscoelastic dampers, which made successively lower floor spars transfer their load to the weakened central column, and the process rapidly continued as the building fell. You'll note that another factor in the collapse is that the building designers joined all the perimeter truss frame sections on one floor at each of the levels where there were mechanical rooms (they were staggered on all the other floors). Rotating this perspective by 90 degrees for this example, it'd be akin to building a brick wall where all the bricks were interlocked except for a section every so many feet in which the bricks were stacked straight up... it'd make for a much weaker wall. Thus, when the plane hit and destroyed part of the truss frame, the uneven stresses were transmitted and focused at those mechanical room levels, allowing them to break apart wholesale, thus allowing entire sections of truss frame above that single-floor join line to lose their ability to support the floor spars. Remember, the truss frame sections were bolted to each other with only two 5/8" bolts per frame section... pretty easy to break that. That Mike Guthrie (aka Rocky) believes one nuke was detonated under each WTC tower and they fell, yet WTC6 was hit by 31 nukes (your k'lame) and stood is proof of how delusional he is. That you believe his blathering sans-proof bullshit is proof of how delusional you are. LOL IOW, it's clear you have no concept of building engineering, physics or reality. IOW, it's clear you're a kook. LOL > I still like the factt there are so many videos on the Internet that show a > wing disapperaring and the fact that someone proved only a CGI using 3D > software can do that particular stunt. Except the video you provided, Kent Wills proved there was no "wing diapperaring" [sic], you're just a broken-brained kook in the throes of a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional break from reality. That your kooky conspiracy theory keeps changing means it doesn't reflect reality. Kook. LOL >>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >> I don't recall what NIST is. But put 9/11 Hoax in youtube and there >> is tons of important information. There is tons of kook blather like that "radiological decontamination" video Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) provided, which didn't show even one instance of rad decon. LOL What there's not a lot of is intellectual discussion of actual building engineering and physics. Your broken brain blathering on about your paranoid delusions doesn't change reality one bit. Deal with it. LOL >> For example the buildings going down look exactly like a >> controlled demolition. Because you have so much experience with controlled demolitions, right? LOL That uncontrolled collapse looked nothing like a controlled demolition, Ko0k. LOL >> Most of this is visual so >> usenet isn't the best place to prove it all. But those who go to >> youtube will be amazed. And the intelligent people will be sickened and amused at the variety of kooks and their blathering stupidity. > COOL thanks because when I did that I found a video I'd been looking for for > a long time. See: > > 9/11 Fake: The Towers Destruction Videos > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp7SDi-lJbU Quoting from that video: "the entire WTC complex (7 buildings) WAS DESTROYED" zOMG! No, that's either a lie, or delusional kook blather. And the kook's inability to track the 5 helicopters that were in the air? Might be because he's stoooopid. And his inability to calculate perspectives and angles? Might be because he's just as stooopid as you. And you're gullible enough to believe this retarded bullshit. You're compounding your stupidity with his. LOL > The part I like is none of the videos show the WCBS chopper and yet the WCBS > chopper was the only one to record an EMP about 12 seconds before the North > Tower was vaporized. Strange. BTW I'll have to pull up the WCBS footage > and see if it has Pat. If it was "the only one to record an EMP", then it wasn't an EMP... I've provided a link to a video from inside one of the towers, just prior to, during and after the collapse... no EMP. There were likely hundreds of videos taken that day... no EMP. You *do* realize even small nukes cause EMP that can disrupt electronic devices in a wide radius, yes? Like hundreds of miles, yes? No?! LOL What you're k'laming was "EMP" was merely satellite uplink interference, as has been explained to you. In fact, there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference on that very WCBS video, which led your broken brain to start k'laming there were 19 nuke detonations... from there your broken brain continued expanding your kooky conspiracy theory... to include a facility dozens of miles below the surface, weapons that could somehow dig themselves up from that facility all by themselves through miles of solid bedrock in 12 seconds, special nukes that didn't leave behind any radioactive byproducts, and as many as 65 nukes. And yet you're stupid enough to *also* k'lame that only *one* video showed any "EMP". LOL IOW, your brain is broken. You're having a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional break from reality. Take your meds, Mike. But the seismographs from around the world didn't pick up any nuclear detonation signatures that day... because there weren't any. That you think there were is just your broken brain blathering nonsense unsupported by any evidence whatsoever, and contradicted by a mountain of strong corroborable evidence. IOW, your brain is broken. You're having a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional break from reality. Take your meds, Mike. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 18 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (). Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 18 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:58 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:07 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: Topaz terrorist je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:17 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 10:21 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:02 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:48 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:05 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:27 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:50 +0000
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:05 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 03:19 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Thanks Topaz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:14 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:40 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:32 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 05:05 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-02 06:37 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 18:50 -0400
Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 06:00 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:00 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 21:53 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:51 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:48 -0700
Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:23 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:22 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:40 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:26 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:03 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 17:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:39 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 16:53 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:33 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:01 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 20:18 -0500
csiph-web