Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.cbm |
| Subject | Re: ATARI is crap! |
| Date | 2016-01-31 10:06 +1300 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <310120161006366103%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink) |
| References | <n73r5f$rj1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <n8gla1$9k2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <8470f86c-1c7f-480a-b06d-64f4c9e459ae@googlegroups.com> |
In article <8470f86c-1c7f-480a-b06d-64f4c9e459ae@googlegroups.com>, Harry Potter <rose.joseph12@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 4:24:22 PM UTC-5, Adelbert Affenstaat wrote: > > > > The ATARI 800 only has crappy games, because the ATARI has crappy sprites, > > crappy colours and a mediocre sound chip. > > > > The C64 is MUCH better! > > > > The SID is great, the VIC is great, the C64 is great! > > I kind of agree. I tried Atari emulators, and, well, they were like > toys--hard-to-use toys. Of course, I think the Vic20 was mostly a toy also, > but programming on a Vic20 I think is more worth it. :) Yep, the good ol' days of programming, when you had a whopping 1K of RAM to play with, so had to program efficiently ... unlike these days of lazy, over-bloated, inefficient code. :-( Write the "Hellow World" program on a VIC 20 BASIC and it takes up a few bytes. Write it on a modern computer in something RealBASIC, build the application, and it takes up a megabyte or more, thanks mostly to all the pointlessly included libraries that aren't even needed.
Back to comp.sys.cbm | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: ATARI is crap! "Adelbert Affenstaat" <a@ff.e> - 2016-01-29 22:24 +0100
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-30 12:36 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:08 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 10:02 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 15:26 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 13:39 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 18:06 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 17:49 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-30 22:17 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 19:38 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-31 07:35 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-01 13:24 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2016-01-31 19:45 -0700
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-01 16:31 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Clu <drclu@swbell.net> - 2016-02-05 10:49 -0600
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-06 09:57 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Harry Potter <rose.joseph12@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 10:56 -0800
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 10:06 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Harry Potter <rose.joseph12@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 15:26 -0800
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-31 13:37 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-31 17:49 -0500
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-01 13:29 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! NOSPAM.Kurt.Weiske@f1.n770.z1199.fidonet.org (Kurt Weiske) - 2016-02-02 06:58 +1200
Re: ATARI is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-02-03 09:31 +1300
Re: ATARI is crap! Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-01-31 21:56 +0100
csiph-web