Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2120719
| From | Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism |
| Subject | Re: definition of sentience |
| Date | 2016-06-06 00:40 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <30mf2d-3l.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <c157c621-84c8-4a4c-a7fa-e42494fe290e@googlegroups.com> <vjvd2d-kpl.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> <82d3343a-c3a8-4071-ab01-55326652ef94@googlegroups.com> <ld6e2d-vjn.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> <545805ff-146c-49a8-ae09-53efc972bb9e@googlegroups.com> |
On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:40:06 -0700, hypatiab7 wrote: > On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:15:06 PM UTC-4, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote: >> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 10:36:39 -0700, Kurt Kurt wrote: >> >> Comment being responded to: "you know full well science is not a >> religion" >> >> >> >> > It's a religion to you. Pure religious faith. Comforting religious >> > faith. >> >> Except it isn't, and you know this, so why keep saying it? >> >> >> >> > All it does is predict experiments part of the time, nothing else. >> >> Which is its job. So your complaint is something that does its job is >> bad? You must have an interesting employment history. >> >> > No truth, no knowledge, no proof, that's all blind religious faith. >> >> You have that backwards. Claiming to have "Truth(tm)!" when unable to >> demonstrate that it is, in fact, true is the hallmark of religion. >> Science is very clear that its theories are provisional, always, never >> to be confused with "Truth(tm)". >> >> Since you obviously don't understand even the tiniest aspect of what >> science is, your opinions on it are about as valid as my >> four-year-old's opinions on geopolitik, and for the same reason. >> >> If you have an actual argument, make it. If all you have is empty crap >> like what you offered above, grow up, get an education, and shut the >> fuck up until then. >> >> HTH. HAND. > > Kurtles knows what science is. He is another narcissist trying to prove > that he can trick people into believing what he says he believes. He > hates atheists because we don't fall for his bill of goods. He is a > deliberate religious troll who has trapped himself in alt.atheism > because we've punctured his ego. He can't leave because he can't win. > He's just another ArtieJoe, Duke,Astroboy, Robert Duncan and Cody. Yet > another pity troll. The longer they're here as total failures, the more > trapped they are. Don't recognize a couple of those names, but being listed in with Duke is a Bad Thing(tm),,, and Robert the Duncan is quickly working himself into my "more amusing than dangerous" list. You'd think between them they could collectively muster a *single* worthwhile argument for whatever it is they supposedly believe.
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: definition of sentience Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 04:34 -0700
Re: definition of sentience Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 09:12 -0700
Re: definition of sentience Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 10:36 -0700
Re: definition of sentience Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 11:08 -0700
Re: definition of sentience Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-06-05 16:50 -0400
Re: definition of sentience Kurt Kurt <passerby31416@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 14:35 -0700
Re: definition of sentience hypatiab7 <hypatiab7@comcast.net> - 2016-06-05 17:40 -0700
Re: definition of sentience Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 00:40 -0700
csiph-web