Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #551821

Re: Gravity needs NO Matter

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Gravity needs NO Matter
Date 2016-02-09 23:04 +0100
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <3017788.IRTTYel32F@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <dbe6360d-1fa1-4da8-a698-92199304bc89@googlegroups.com> <18188435.ipTnd2qW7E@PointedEars.de> <9ad95574-0857-4741-bc76-afd04e31c8e0@googlegroups.com> <3060938.Q0NklVMHhb@PointedEars.de> <bcd3fc64-ecdb-4743-ba6e-b98159dfa6aa@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Y.Porat wrote:

> On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 6:22:38 PM UTC+2, Thomas 'PointedEars'
> Lahn wrote:
>> 2. That there is a “kg” in it does not mean that “ℎ has the kilogram
>>    dimension” as you claimed.  The kilogram is a unit, not a dimension.
> 
> […]
> Kilogram is not a dimension ??

Yes (it is not).

> so what  is  it ??

A unit.

> is it length
> is it time ?
> is it zero entity for garment ?

AISB (if only you cared to read), the kilogram is the SI unit of mass.
 
> G W)= m  g

This is nonsense.  But let us assume that it was intended to be an equation 
instead, then:

> m is not a dimension ??

Yes, in a form of the equation above that makes sense, “m” is a *symbol* for 
the physical *quantity* of “mass” instead.

> what are the dimensions of G weight

There is no such thing as “G weight”.

> if your weight is 70 kilograms

Different to common non-scientific usage, in physics weight is actually 
_not_ measured in kilograms or any other unit of mass.  It is a force – the 
algebraic opposite of the force that needs to exerted on a body in order to 
prevent that body from free fall –; its SI unit is the newton (unit symbol 
“N”; 1 N = 1 kg × m × s⁻²).

> can you describe the dimensions of your weight ??

Yes.  BTDT.

> TIA

You’re welcome.  HTH.


PointedEars
-- 
I heard that entropy isn't what it used to be.

(from: WolframAlpha)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 00:14 -0800
  Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-05 22:38 +0100
    Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 06:34 -0800
      Re: Gravity needs NO Matter HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 08:01 -0800
        Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 08:42 -0800
          Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 10:11 -0800
            Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 10:22 -0800
          Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 10:39 -0800
            Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 11:06 -0800
              Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:32 -0800
              editen sujet noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:14 -0800
        Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 10:00 -0800
      Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-06 17:22 +0100
        Re: Gravity needs NO Matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 08:41 -0800
          Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-06 18:08 +0100
            Re: Gravity needs NO Matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 09:17 -0800
              Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-06 18:25 +0100
                Re: Gravity needs NO Matter john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 09:27 -0800
                Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:45 -0800
                Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 23:31 +0100
        Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 10:41 -0800
          Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 23:04 +0100
            Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:37 -0800
              Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 20:33 +0100
                Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-10 20:44 +0100
                Re: Gravity needs NO Matter "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 22:57 -0800
                Re: Gravity needs NO Matter Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-13 19:41 +0100

csiph-web