Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #454681
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) |
| Date | 2017-04-01 17:31 -0700 |
| Organization | highland technology |
| Message-ID | <2dh0ecdo3rqbmf75sq1k40u5a1upbi6cpp@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <28246daf-fd57-48e6-a94e-2e778c9a3973@googlegroups.com> <049f13d9-358b-4173-aa2c-13af79004b7f@googlegroups.com> <obpe3o0174h@drn.newsguy.com> |
On 1 Apr 2017 16:46:00 -0700, Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote: >John Miles, KE5FX wrote... >> >>On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-7, tabb...@gmail.com wrote: >>> It's a known issue with some opamps, but I've stayed quiet cos I can't >>> remember where a datasheet (IIRC) talks about it. IIRC the advise was >>> to keep source impedance under 10k, and the cause is stray capacitive >>> coupling from output to input plus a faster input stage than output >>> stage. But as I say, I can't remember where this was from so ICBW. >> >>Doesn't seem like a typical phase-margin gotcha, or one that involves external >>coupling or feedback of any kind. There's no sensitivity to stray C at >>all. There must be a thermal component to the phenomenon, because it's only >>noticeable at very low frequencies and is quite sensitive to temperature. The >>oscillation itself is around 700 - 800 kHz but I've never seen it appear on >>signals above a few kHz. No electrical time constants are anywhere near that. >> >>Given that people don't usually use pricy low-noise opamps with high- >>resistance sources, I guess it's not too surprising that the issue isn't >>well-known. That's no excuse for manufacturers not knowing about it and >>warning accordingly, though. > > Yes, John. But I think its safe to say opamps going through > input-pair transitions at certain voltages are suspect to be > used at those voltages. Your experience illustrates that point. But what's the use of a rail-to-rail opamp if, well, you can't use it rail to rail? I mean, really! Sounds like LTC scrooed up that one. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 00:37 -0700
Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 04:50 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-29 13:23 +0100
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 10:58 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-03-29 23:29 +0200
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 17:14 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 18:06 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) Gerhard Hoffmann <ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de> - 2017-03-31 14:40 +0200
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 14:49 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-03-31 20:39 -0400
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-04-01 09:16 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-04-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-04-01 17:31 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-04-01 20:59 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 21:41 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-04-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-04-02 16:26 -0500
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) krw@notreal.com - 2017-04-02 19:29 -0400
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-04-02 18:34 -0500
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-29 05:18 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 10:56 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-29 13:02 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) "John Miles, KE5FX" <jmiles@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 17:57 -0700
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-04-02 16:31 -0500
Re: Another op-amp stability question (LT1677) John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-04-15 08:58 -0700
csiph-web