Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #678079

Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition

Show all headers | View raw

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 21:32:39 -0800 (PST)

Subject: PAGE13, 1-13, evidence proving Atom Totality: Space is Dirac's Sea of
 positrons /textbook 8th ed. 2017
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 05:32:40 +0000


PAGE13, 1-13, evidence proving Atom Totality: Space is Dirac's Sea of positrons /textbook 8th ed. 2017


In an atom totality, space is positron while our matter is electron=muon matter of the last six electrons=muons of 231Pu atom totality. 

Since my discovery in 2017 that the real electron = muon, thus, that means the positrons of Old Physics were merely the flip side of the magnetic monopole of -1 charge of .5 MeV. So a positron is a magnetic monopole of +1 charge and .5 MeV.

Alright, I have to include the fact of the Dirac Sea, and few people in science realize its vast significance. It is a proving feature of the Atom Totality and throws the Big Bang theory into the dizzy dustbin. 

What the Dirac Sea tells us is that Space is the antiparticle of the electron=muon. We live and observe matter which is the last 6 electrons=muons of 231Pu Atom Totality, a gigantic big atom, and the Space of that big atom is the positrons = +1 charged monopoles, positrons make-up space. Now here I have to be careful for the muon has a antiparticle of a +1 muon, and I have no idea whether the +1 muon is composed of +1 monopoles. This is something to iron out in a 9th edition. But when we probe in the Atom Totality space in experiments in the lab or in cosmic ray observations we find positrons= monopoles. 

--- Quoting liberally from Wikipedia on the Dirac Sea, where the format allows: 
--- 
The Dirac sea is a theoretical model of the vacuum as an infinite sea of particles with negative energy. It was first postulated by the British physicist Paul Dirac in 1930[1] to explain the anomalous negative-energy quantum states predicted by the Dirac equation for relativistic electrons.[2] The positron, the antimatter counterpart of the electron, was originally conceived of as a hole in the Dirac sea, well before its experimental discovery in 1932.[nb 1] 

Upon solving the free Dirac equation, . . one finds[3] . . 
. . where . . 
. . for plane wave solutions with 3-momentum p. This is a direct consequence of the relativistic energy-momentum relation . . 
. . upon which the Dirac equation is built. The quantity U is a constant 2 × 1 column vector and N is a normalization constant. The quantity ε is called the time evolution factor, and its interpretation in similar roles in, for example, the plane wave solutions of the Schrödinger equation, is the energy of the wave (particle). This interpretation is not immediately available here since it may acquire negative values. A similar situation prevails for the Klein–Gordon equation. In that case, the absolute value of ε can be interpreted as the energy of the wave since in the canonical formalism, waves with negative ε actually have positive energy Ep.[4] But this is not the case with the Dirac equation. The energy in the canonical formalism associated with negative ε is –Ep.[5] 

In hole theory, the solutions with negative time evolution factors are reinterpreted as representing the positron, discovered by Carl Anderson. The interpretation of this result requires a Dirac sea, showing that the Dirac equation is not merely a combination of special relativity and quantum mechanics, but it also implies that the number of particles cannot be conserved.[6] 

--- end quoting Wikipedia on the Dirac Sea --- 

Few people in physics ever discuss the Dirac Sea, not only because it is too much over the head of most physicists, but because it directly challenges and disposes of the Big Bang theory, for what it is saying is that Space itself is a positron particle/s. (Space is the +1 muon or antimuon.)

And it is here that we unify the photon with neutrino as being one and the same particle only with the means of propagation a difference. The neutrino is a longitudinal wave and the photon is the same only double transverse wave. The neutrino originates and ends with a proton particle, while the photon originates and ends with a electron=muon particle. 

Evidence that Space is positrons=monopoles is only possible in a Atom Totality theory, not the structure-less Big Bang theory. If the Big Bang theory were true, Anderson in 1932 could never have found positrons as Space and the Dirac Equation makes no sense, but it does. 

Speaking some more about Space and astronomy, in Old Physics, they wanted to unify the four forces-- strong nuclear, weak nuclear, Coulomb EM and gravity, which was a major major goal of physics in the 20th century, however, they failed miserably. The only reasonable unification would be to ask which of these four forces has a "perfect particle" and the answer is EM Coulomb force has the photon, the perfect particle. And by logic, we then acquiesce to the fact that a unification always ends up as what is "perfect particle" and that the four forces become a Coulomb force because the photon is Coulomb force. What is surprising though, in this unification, is that the Coulomb force ends up being a variable force strength and not a single solo force strength of just 1/R^2, but varies from R to 1/R to 1/R^2. 

Now in astronomy, recently in the past two years we have had remarkable new science discoveries about Space and gravity, which to this day is new and alarming, and not well understood. For one, the spacecraft Hitomi broke up due to spin, for another, the spacecraft Juno almost broke up due to Jupiter's unexpected stronger magnetism than what was anticipated. This is the spin term of EM-gravity and did not allow for Juno's valves to properly open. Then there was Cassini showing the hexagonal north pole of Saturn. So all these space missions are bringing us the realization that we only crudely know what gravity is. That we have to ditch the Newton gravity and ditch the General Relativity. We have to learn better, what EM gravity is, far better, before we think of returning to the Moon or exploring Europa or other bodies.

Now in a new upcoming mission of a probe sent to the Sun, hopefully we can find whether the Sun is hollow or not hollow. I propose equipping the spacecraft with a radioactive rod that can be monitored on Earth, as the craft disintegrates into the Sun. Let us find out for sure, if the Sun is Hollow, and of course, a Hollow Sun means gravity is EM force, not the force of Newton or General Relativity. When it is confirmed that the Sun is hollow, would also confirm that no black holes exist, and that the centers of galaxies are hollow, for a region of high density plasma obeys EM theory that the Gauss's law of electricity-- charge moves to the outer surface.



Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon of 231Pu

                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 

One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
 
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts in peace and quiet.     

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 
 
Comments:: So, when I get around to doing the 9th edition of this textbook, I want to be fully clear in my mind what electricity-- the flow of current in a wire, what is that exactly? For it seems implausible that muons=electrons are in motion. And rather than muons flowing, it is the magnetic monopoles, those small .5 MeV particles that are either photons or neutrinos carrying a .5 MeV charge packet.

>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 17:22:56 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: Unless Maxwell discovered E= mc^2, Apparently Heaviside in 1889
 was first with work on Capacitors
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 01:22:57 +0000

>
Re: Unless Maxwell discovered E= mc^2, Apparently Heaviside in 1889 was first with work on Capacitors
>
Now, I better be careful, very careful with what I say here. For I am just talking off the top of my head on some intuition of mine. 
>
That I discovered the Real Electron is the 105 MeV muon particle and that the other puny tiny little particle of .5 MeV was a magnetic monopole not of .5MeV rest-mass but of .5 MeV charge energy and it was a photon dressed up with charge energy-- or neutrino. 

So, here, where E = mc^2, the question becomes, does there ever exist in Nature a case where -- other than matter to antimatter collision, ever the case where rest mass is converted to energy? I doubt it. 

That means, all the energy from any and every star is monopole or photon or neutrino or meson energy, none of which is a conversion of rest-mass. 

And that makes sense, because each day the Sun shines, it does not emit any muons or protons in the form of E=mc^2. The muons and protons of the Sun are the same amount or more than 1, or 2 or 3 billion years ago. 

And all this talk and idea that the stars give out due to E=mc^2 is phony baloney. The hydrogen in the Sun is not losing rest mass due to E=mc^2. 
>
So I think a comprehensive review of the Sun and Stars is needed. 
>
AP 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

-PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 08:26 -0700
  Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 11:52 -0700
    Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 16:51 -0700
      Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 17:55 -0700
        Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 12:49 -0700
          Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 14:59 -0700
            Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 16:29 -0700
            Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 18:55 -0700
              Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 14:36 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 16:33 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-24 10:42 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-24 13:28 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-24 15:37 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-24 18:27 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-25 20:52 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 13:56 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 15:44 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 17:04 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 20:52 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 11:26 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 12:20 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 15:32 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 16:34 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:45 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 16:28 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 17:09 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 21:23 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:47 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 19:32 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 12:59 +0100
                talking to Keith about his "thoughts" Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 11:36 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 15:38 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 12:03 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 17:39 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 10:43 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 16:28 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 20:25 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 12:25 -0700
                Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-04 14:09 -0700
  Re: -PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-30 12:08 +0100

csiph-web