Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #720316

Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2018-12-22 19:14 -0800
References <da098e18-5f26-407e-8ed9-ba8b73a9708a@googlegroups.com> <pvm0ln$5va$1@pcls7.std.com> <pvmud6$bln$3@pcls7.std.com>
Message-ID <2d80692c-684c-4cd5-992e-3d7e793c7520@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood
From James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 7:11:37 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> James McGinn writes:
> >moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
> 
> >>>Dalton's is well understood.
> 
> >>Apparently not by yourself.  Otherwise you could have answered my simple
> >>question easily.
> 
> >>You have dry (no H2O of any form) air at 20 C.  You introduce some liquid
> >>water, also at 20 C,  into it.  According to Dalton's Law, what happens?
> 
> >>I will interpret any personal attack as an admission that you cannot solve
> >>this problem.
> 
> >You incompetent dolts can't even put forth a rational question.
> >Laws don't make predictions, dumbass. ...
> 
> <snip more rants and insults>
> 
> Thanks for making my point. You really just don't understand Dalton's Law
> at all. So why did you claim it is well understood? Or well understood by
> everyone except yourself?

You got nothing you loon.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:24 -0800
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-22 18:44 +0000
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:10 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:56 +0000
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 11:06 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 19:30 +0000
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-23 03:11 +0000
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-22 20:00 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:50 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-22 21:32 -0600
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 12:10 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-25 17:22 +0000
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:16 -0800

csiph-web