Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #519661
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun |
| Date | 2015-09-07 23:31 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <2cj1cc-nqd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <zdCdnWezL9yoInDInZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <e3cdb11c-eb35-4c49-8620-7996ce2fed44@googlegroups.com> |
nuny@bid.nes <Alien8752@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, September 7, 2015 at 9:45:45 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: >> A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about >> our Sun >> > http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.7199 >> >> > As hikers and other navigators know, Earth's magnetic axis is tilted >> > with respect to its rotation axis. Such misalignment had not been >> > expected in the Sun--but now it's been seen. NASA's Solar Dynamics >> > Observatory (SDO) has been trained on the Sun for half of the current >> > 11-year cycle of solar activity. Using SDO's Helioseismic and >> > Magnetic Imager, Adur Pastor Yabar of the Institute of Astrophysics >> > of the Canary Islands and his colleagues created daily maps of the >> > line-of-sight strength and polarity of the Sun's magnetic field for >> > each of the mission's first 1700 days. > > To drag the topic back to actual physics- does the surface rotation or the magnetic field axis maintain a constant direction on space? > > > Mark L. Fergerson You mean other than the regular reversal with every sunspot cycle? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 11:45 -0500
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 16:55 +0000
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 12:04 -0500
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 17:31 +0000
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 20:02 +0200
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-07 13:15 -0500
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-09-07 14:43 -0400
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 16:12 -0700
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 23:31 +0000
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 18:36 -0700
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 03:40 +0000
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun jaymoseley@hotmail.com - 2015-09-08 03:14 -0700
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 08:44 -0500
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2015-09-08 05:42 -0700
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 08:33 -0500
Re: A five-year sequence of daily observations has yielded a surprise about our Sun gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-08 10:11 -0500
csiph-web