Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and, linear geometry is paradoxical

Newsgroups	sci.physics
Date	2018-05-03 13:45 -0700
Message-ID	<2ce6eefe-e93d-479c-9d79-4527490e493e@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and, linear geometry is paradoxical
From	Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 12:21:22 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and,
 linear geometry is paradoxical
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 19:21:22 +0000

Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and, linear geometry is paradoxical

Call it the CO2 Paradox, actually two paradoxes in one. 

__First paradox__ is that CO2 is the densest of atmosphere common gases, the most dense. And being the most dense common gas in the atmosphere it should fall out and not be the greenhouse gas that is causing Global Warming. 

78.09% nitrogen 

20.95% oxygen 

.93% argon 

.04% carbon dioxide 

.4% water vapor 

___Second Paradox__ is that CO2 is attributed with a Linear geometry as this 

O=C=O 

Linear covalent double bonds. Yet a linear geometry requires extra energy in formation of the C in the middle spot of a former O to O bonded O2 molecule. That is a paradoxical geometry of linear suggesting for some unknown physics manipulation of a C atom displacing a O=O bonding. 

So we have two paradoxes with Old Chemistry of CO2. How can it be the Greenhouse Gas causing Global Warming if too dense to stay in the atmosphere ( I have seen no scientist addressing this issue) And secondly, why would the formation of CO2 be linear when being linear is an added extra cost in energy, when triangular CO2 just as H2O is a triangular molecule, would be the natural formation of CO2. 

Why not the O2 molecule impact the C atom and then form this 
   C 
  //\\ 
O=O 

Which is likely that the animal respiration breathing is a triangular CO2. 

Wrestling with these two paradoxes of CO2, the natural and most simple explanation so far, that I have come up with, is that the Greenhouse gas causing global warming is CO, carbon monoxide for it is lightweight and can stay permanently in the atmosphere. 

As to why chemists have thought CO2 was linear, is a problem that they used only fire produced CO2 from burning fossil fuels. And a fire produced CO2 is different in geometry from a animal breathing CO2. 

I think that is the best a Logical mind can do on CO2 given the data at present. 

That CO is the global warming gas, not CO2 for it is too dense to stay in the atmosphere. And that the reason the planet Earth's flora is not lush green from all that extra CO2 from fossil fuel burning, is because that CO2 has two geometry forms, it has a triangular CO2 which plants do need, and it has a linear CO2 which is toxic to plants. 

Now there maybe a middle ground explanation, that when fire produced linear CO2 is formed, it is not stable for long and decomposes into CO molecules such as this reaction: 

CO2 + CO2 --> 2CO + O2 

All of which can be answered simply, by collecting animal CO2 specifically, not contaminated with any fossil fuel CO2. How that is to be done is challenging. I suppose take a containment and vacuum out the gases, next, infuse pure oxygen nitrogen mix for an animal. Then place in containment for a period of time to have enough animal CO2, release animal unharmed and find out if that animal CO2 is far different than the linear fossil fuel CO2. 

AP

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and,  linear geometry is paradoxical Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 13:45 -0700
  Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and,  linear geometry is paradoxical Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 17:41 -0700
    CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 18:33 -0700
      CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 20:59 -0700
        Re: CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:07 -0700
          Re: CO (perhaps N2) because of "formal charge" forms a dome as a atmosphere and causes global warming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 22:25 -0700
            linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 05:51 -0700
              linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 08:05 -0700
                linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 09:10 -0700
                linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 12:23 -0700
                Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 14:18 -0700
                Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 14:45 -0700
                Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 18:09 -0400
                Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 15:21 -0700
                carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 18:52 -0700
                carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 19:24 -0700
                Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 21:30 -0700
                if CO2 were in the atmosphere, why do we not see carbonic acid fall from sky Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 22:47 -0700
                Re: if CO2 were in the atmosphere, why do we not see carbonic acid fall from sky Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 10:43 -0700
                Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:48 -0400
                Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-05 13:43 +0000
                Re: Biological CO2 is 120 degree triangular while linear CO2 comes from fire Re: carbonic acid Re: linear CO2 is making the oceans a lifeless sewer for humanity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-06 01:50 +0000
              Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-18 23:47 +0000

csiph-web