Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #45845
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | <n8e7im$jqr$2@gioia.aioe.org> <427b01ff5d966a0133441456783098e3@dizum.com> <n8gfgm$1u4b$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Subject | Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. |
| Message-ID | <2a202e904886cd71c843cd93ba6917fc@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-01-30 06:07 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:n8gfgm$1u4b$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 29/01/2016 12:23 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: Your cowardly snipping noted and fixored, LunkHead. >> Does Moronic LunkHead not understand that clouds block shortwave >> radiation, thereby increasing albedo and *lowering* temperature? That >> clouds are mostly transparent to the reflected longwave radiation? >> That only relatively thin high-level cirrus and altostratus clouds >> would result in net warming, whereas over the glaciers, the clouds >> tend to be low-level and thus contribute to net cooling? > By day, perhaps. At night, they act as a blanket, raising temperature. Bwahahahaa! Oh. My. Gawd. What a fecking moron. LunkHead snips out the part that proves her wrong, then bleats out more wrong shit! LOL! "That clouds are mostly transparent to the reflected longwave radiation?" Gee... guess what wavelength that *reflected*, *radiated* heat is at night? Ever heard of the infrared atmospheric window, LunkHead? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_window> =============================================== The infrared atmospheric window is the overall dynamic property of the earth's atmosphere, taken as a whole at each place and occasion of interest, that lets some infrared radiation from the cloud tops and land-sea surface pass directly to space without intermediate absorption and re-emission, and thus without heating the atmosphere. Without the infrared atmospheric window, the Earth would become much too warm to support life, and possibly so warm that it would lose its water, as Venus did early in solar system history. Thus, the existence of an atmospheric window is critical to Earth remaining a habitable planet. =============================================== LunkHead denies there's an infrared atmospheric window, and thus "duh Urf is gunna turn inta a big ol' farbawl!" LOL You couldn't get more moronic if you tried, LunkHead. LOL > Same effect, high albedo reflects sunlight, but also radiation from the > ground that might otherwise carry heat away into space. Wrong because you're a half-wit. LOL > Have you ever noticed that it's warmer on cloudy winter nights than on > clear winter nights? Do you realize that you just k'lamed that it isn't, > even though it is? That's your kOok kAlling kArd, and a sign that you > may end up in the running for February's Loony Maroon if you keep > screeding like this. What about "That only relatively thin high-level cirrus and altostratus clouds would result in net warming, whereas over the glaciers, the clouds tend to be low-level and thus contribute to net cooling?" don't you understand, LunkHead? Yet again LunkHead finds herself 180 degrees out from reality, because she's a moronic libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kook who has her head so far up liberalism's ass she can't even see reality, let alone acknowledge it. <snicker> >>> (Cue screeding from climate change denier ko0ks in 3...2...1...) >> "The clouds! The CLOUDS!! THEY'RE COMIN' RIGHT FOR US! RUUUUNNN!" >> >> Ah, you Chicken Little'ing Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are always good >> for a laugh. >> >> <snicker> > Thank you for your cooperation, Screedy McFrothyKo0k. > > *snicker* Thanks for proving yet again that you're an idiot. LOL -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 554 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-28 18:17 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-28 19:10 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-29 00:17 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-28 21:14 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-29 05:37 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-28 22:24 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-29 06:23 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-29 02:56 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-29 14:45 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-30 06:07 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-30 01:25 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-30 16:43 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-30 17:16 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-30 17:57 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-01-31 19:53 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 19:03 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-01 17:10 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-01 18:41 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:07 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 13:25 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:31 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 13:43 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:51 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 14:08 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 08:19 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-01 15:50 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 15:59 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 07:38 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 02:08 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 16:30 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 08:53 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-02 17:21 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-02 11:33 -0600
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 22:21 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 16:55 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 16:44 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 04:52 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:14 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 07:07 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:45 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 05:03 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-02 04:11 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:17 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-01-31 05:26 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-30 22:15 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-01-31 00:37 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 22:42 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-01 17:00 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-01 15:54 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-01 16:03 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-01 14:09 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 07:28 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 02:09 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-02 17:32 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-02 12:56 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:14 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-02 16:59 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 16:45 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 05:10 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-02 23:24 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:17 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-02 21:49 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 06:51 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:44 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-03 07:19 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 00:47 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-03 08:57 +0000
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 02:38 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-03 18:33 +0100
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-03 11:18 -0700
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-03 04:26 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:12 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. Antonio Santana <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:52 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. MartinS <me@my.place.invalid> - 2016-01-29 11:49 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-29 17:41 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-29 20:56 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-29 19:56 -0800
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-01-30 17:58 -0500
Re: More bad news for Greenland's ice cap. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-01-30 18:53 -0800
csiph-web