Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #51197
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: The Death of 10.8? |
| Date | 2013-10-29 08:58 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <291020130858547861%michelle@michelle.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <barmar-58776C.18105228102013@news.eternal-september.org> <slrnl6uqf2.d0e.mr@irc.sandman.net> <291020130957237203%star@sky.net> <291020130735543773%michelle@michelle.org> <slrnl6vml8.dqj.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
In article <slrnl6vml8.dqj.mr@irc.sandman.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > > If I recall correctly from my days in software development, alpha means > > feature complete; i.e., all features specified in the design documents > > are in place and work at least rudimentally. > > Not generally not. It's up to anyone how they want to apply these labels to > their projects of course, but hte consensus is that "alpha" means that the > software is run internally for testing. The definitions I gave are my recollection of how we used the terms at Claris. > "beta" is when the software is feature-complete and it is released for > external testing (by users, other developers, depending on your setup). Sometimes we didn't release the products for external testing until we were in late beta; just because it was beta didn't mean we released it for external testing. > Some use "pre-alpha" as well to signify the phase before internal testing > and very little executable code has been written. Depending on how you > develop this phase can include mockups, UI stacks, databases and data, but > not anything complete to hold them together. :) We were testing during pre-alpha, but only those areas the developers said to test. The object was to find and fix bugs as early in the development cycle as we could possibly do.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 14:08 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Mordred <mordred@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 15:53 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:12 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-28 08:34 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? android <here@there.was> - 2013-10-28 16:48 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? android <here@there.was> - 2013-10-28 16:55 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-10-28 16:24 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? android <here@there.was> - 2013-10-28 17:33 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 10:10 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2013-10-28 16:14 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:39 +1300
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 14:23 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:54 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-28 14:50 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Mordred <mordred@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 19:56 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-28 15:11 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 21:24 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-28 18:10 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 07:49 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-29 05:49 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 10:25 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-29 06:52 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 11:41 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2013-10-29 10:29 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 15:38 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 06:36 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 06:35 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 06:33 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-29 08:47 -0500
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 15:45 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 14:32 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-10-29 09:57 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 07:35 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 15:50 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-29 08:58 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 16:03 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 23:36 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 14:32 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 18:11 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? David Fritzinger <dfritzin@nospam.mac.com> - 2013-10-28 12:19 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Mordred <mordred@gmail.com> - 2013-10-28 19:59 +0100
Re: The Death of 10.8? me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-10-28 16:22 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 20:53 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-10-28 21:55 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 22:53 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-28 18:58 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 23:24 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 19:13 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 16:32 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 16:35 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-28 20:04 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 22:45 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 23:26 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-29 18:14 -0700
Re: The Death of 10.8? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-10-28 23:59 -0400
Re: The Death of 10.8? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 20:50 +0000
Re: The Death of 10.8? jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-29 10:53 +1300
csiph-web